Good collaborative practice

Reforming capacity building governance of international health research partnerships

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19534418
AutoresClaire Leonie Ward (0000-0002-4813-0133, University of Basel, autor de correspondencia), David Shaw (0000-0001-8180-6927, University of Basel), DOMINIQUE SPRUMONT (University of Neuchâtel), Osman Sankoh (0000-0003-4405-9808, Indepth Network), Marcel Tanner (0000-0002-1205-6971, University of Basel), Bernice S Elger (0000-0002-4249-7399, University of Basel), Bernice Elger
Año2018
Volumen14
Número1
Páginas1-1
Fecha de publicación2018-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaGlobalization and Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1744-8603 • E-ISSN: 1744-8603
EditorialSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/s12992-017-0319-4
PMID29310698
OpenAlexW2784042409
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas26
Referencias citadas34

In line with the policy objectives of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, this commentary seeks to examine the extent to which provisions of international health research guidance promote capacity building and equitable partnerships in global health research. Our evaluation finds that governance of collaborative research partnerships, and in particular capacity building, in resource-constrained settings is limited but has improved with the implementation guidance of the International Ethical Guidelines for Health-related Research Involving Humans by The Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (2016). However, more clarity is needed in national legislation, industry and ethics guidelines, and regulatory provisions to address the structural inequities and power imbalances inherent in international health research partnerships. Most notably, ethical partnership governance is not supported by the principal industry ethics guidelines - the International Conference on Harmonization Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceutical for Human Use (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP). Given the strategic value of ICH-GCP guidelines in defining the role and responsibility of global health research partners, we conclude that such governance should stipulate the minimal requirements for creating an equitable environment of inclusion, mutual learning, transparency and accountability. Procedurally, this can be supported by i) shared research agenda setting with local leadership, ii) capacity assessments, and iii) construction of a memorandum of understanding (MoU). Moreover, the requirement of capacity building needs to be coordinated amongst partners to support good collaborative practice and deliver on the public health goals of the research enterprise; improving local conditions of health and reducing global health inequality. In this respect, and in order to develop consistency between sources of research governance, ICH-GCP should reference CIOMS ethical guidelines as the established standard for collaborative partnership. Moreover, greater commitment and support should be given to co-ordinate, strengthen and enforce local laws requiring equitable research partnerships and health system strengthening

Accountability · Business · Capacity building · Corporate governance · General partnership · Global health · Health services research · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Global Health and Surgery · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration · Health Policy