Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Positioning women's and children's health in African union policy-making

A policy analysis

Bibliographic Data

ID19534657
AuthorsKadidiatou Toure (0000-0002-1948-8187, World Health Organization, corresponding author), Rotimi Sankore, Shyama Kuruvilla (0000-0002-0327-4467, World Health Organization), Elisa Scolaro (World Health Organization - Pakistan), Flavia Bustreo (World Health Organization - Pakistan), Babatunde Osotimehin (United Nations Population Fund)
Year2012
Volume8
Issue1
Pages3
Publication date2012-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGlobalization and Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1744-8603 • E-ISSN: 1744-8603
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1186/1744-8603-8-3
PMID22340362
PMCIDPMC3298467
OpenAlexW2116744509
LanguageEN
References cited18

BACKGROUND: With limited time to achieve the Millennium Development Goals, progress towards improving women's and children's health needs to be accelerated. With Africa accounting for over half of the world's maternal and child deaths, the African Union (AU) has a critical role in prioritizing related policies and catalysing required investments and action. In this paper, the authors assess the evolution of African Union policies related to women's and children's health, and analyze how these policies are prioritized and framed. METHODS: The main method used in this policy analysis was a document review of all African Union policies developed from 1963 to 2010, focusing specifically on policies that explicitly mention health. The findings from this document review were discussed with key actors to identify policy implications. RESULTS: With over 220 policies in total, peace and security is the most common AU policy topic. Social affairs and other development issues became more prominent in the 1990s. The number of policies that mentioned health rose steadily over the years (with 1 policy mentioning health in 1963 to 7 in 2010).This change was catalysed by factors such as: a favourable shift in AU priorities and systems towards development issues, spurred by the transition from the Organization of African Unity to the African Union; the mandate of the African Commission on Human and People's Rights; health-related advocacy initiatives, such as the Campaign for the Accelerated Reduction of Maternal Mortality in Africa (CARMMA); action and accountability requirements arising from international human rights treaties, the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), and new health-funding mechanisms, such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.Prioritization of women's and children's health issues in AU policies has been framed primarily by human rights, advocacy and accountability considerations, more by economic and health frames looking at investments and impact. AU policies related to reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health also use fewer policy frames than do AU policies related to HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis and malaria. CONCLUSION: We suggest that more effective prioritization of women's and children's health in African Union policies would be supported by widening the range of policy frames used (notably health and economic) and strengthening the evidence base of all policy frames used. In addition, we suggest it would be beneficial if the partner groups advocating for women's and children's health were multi-stakeholder, and included, for instance, health care professionals, regional institutions, parliamentarians, the media, academia, NGOs, development partners and the public and private sectors

Accountability · Commission · Developing country · Development economics · Economic growth · Economic policy · Economics · European union · Health care · Human rights · Mandate · Millennium Development Goals · Policy analysis · Political science · Public health · Social policy · Global Maternal and Child Health · HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses · Human Rights and Development · Law · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration · Health Policy

  • Generation of political priority for global health initiatives

    Open Access•Joseph Shiffman, Jeremy Shiffman et al.•The Lancet•2007

  • Maternal mortality for 181 countries, 1980–2008

    Open Access•Margaret C Hogan, Kyle J Foreman et al.•The Lancet•2010

  • Countdown to 2015 decade report (2000–10)

    Open Access•Zulfiqar A Bhutta, Mickey Chopra et al.•The Lancet•2010

  • Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning

    Bruce Jennings, Maarten A Hajer et al.•Argumentative Turn in Policy…•2013

  • Framing health and foreign policy

    Open Access•Ronald Labonté, Michelle Gagnon et al.•Globalization and Health•2010

  • Framing Processes in Public Commentary on US Federal Tobacco Control Regulation

    Open Access•Andrew L Roth, Joshua Dunsby et al.•Social Studies of Science•2003

  • The national impact of European Union regulatory policy

    Open Access•Christoph Knill, Dirk Lehmkuhl•European Journal of Political…•2002

  • Doing' health policy analysis

    Open Access•Gerrit Van Der Waldt, G Walt et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2008

Highly citedNo
Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae