The United States withdrawal from the world health organization (WHO), its implications for global health governance
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19534774 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Stephen Olaide Aremu (0000-0002-7473-7254, Nasarawa State University), Akyala Ishaku Adamu (Nasarawa State University), Odinaka Kingsley Obeta (0000-0001-7221-1307, Nasarawa State University), Donald Ofili Ibe (Nasarawa State University), Solomon Ambina Mairiga (Nasarawa State University), Mojisola Ashiat Otukoya (Nasarawa State University), Abdillahi Abdi Barkhadle (0009-0006-7835-7562, Rift Valley University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 21 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 48-48 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Globalization and Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1744-8603 • E-ISSN: 1744-8603 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1186/s12992-025-01137-0 |
| PMID | 40796848 |
| OpenAlex | W4413110554 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 11 |
On January 20, 2025, the United States initiated its withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) through an executive order, citing concerns over the organization's handling of global health crises, political influences, and financial inequities. This commentary explores the historical context of the U.S.-WHO relationship, provides an analysis of the justifications for withdrawal, and examines the global and domestic consequences of this decision. Historically, the U.S. has been a significant player in the WHO, contributing substantial funding and advancing global health initiatives. However, tensions have arisen, particularly following the COVID-19 pandemic, where accusations of inefficiency, political bias, and financial disparities became more pronounced. The withdrawal highlights a call for WHO reform, particularly in enhancing transparency, accountability, and efficiency. On a global scale, the U.S. departure threatens to destabilize WHO's funding, weaken leadership, and hinder future pandemic preparedness. Domestically, the U.S. plans to redirect resources to alternative organizations and enhance national health capacities. Critics argue that this move could weaken international collaboration, erode trust, and damage U.S. influence in global health governance. This commentary ultimately underscores the complexities and potential risks associated with disengagement from multilateral health initiatives and the broader implications for global health security
Accountability · Corporate governance · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Global governance · Global health · Global Leadership · Health care · International health · International Health Regulations · Political science · Politics · Preparedness · Public health · Public relations · Global Health and Surgery · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law · Medicine · Public Administration · Public Health Policies and Education · Finance · Health Policy
Flexibly funding WHO? An analysis of its donors’ voluntary contributions
The financial sustainability of the World Health Organization and the political economy of global health governance
Contesting focality in global health governance
The World Health Organization and the Transition From “International” to “Global” Public Health
Explaining the failure of global health governance during Covid-19
| Citations per year | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |