Strengthening global health security – lessons learned from public health England’s international health regulations strengthening project

BACKGROUND: Country experiences of responding to the challenges of COVID-19 in 2020 highlighted how critical it is to have strong, in-country health security capacity. The UK government has invested in health security capacity development through various projects and agencies, including the UK Department of Health and Social Care, whose Global Health Security Programme provides funding to Public Health England (PHE) to implement health security support. This article describes the results and conclusions of the midterm evaluation, undertaken by Itad, of one of Public Health England's global health projects: International Health Regulations Strengthening, which operates across six countries and works with the Africa Centres for Disease Control. It also highlights some of the key lessons learned for the benefit of other agencies moving into supporting national health security efforts. RESULTS: The Itad team found strong evidence that the IHR Project is well aligned with, and responding to, partners' capability strengthening needs and that the three workstreams - systems coordination, workforce development and technical systems strengthening are implementing relevant and appropriate action to support national priorities. The IHR Project is also aligned with and complementary to other relevant UK development assistance although the Project could strengthen the strategic collaboration with WHO, US CDC and other UK government projects in countries. The Itad team also found that the IHR Project could be more effective if the technical assistance activities were accompanied by relevant materials and equipment while maintaining its supportive role. There was evidence of where technical assistance in the form of training and follow-up mentoring had led to improvements in practice and in IHR compliance, but these were not being systematically captured by the Project's routine reporting. CONCLUSIONS: There was good evidence that the project was doing the right things and aligning its work in the right way, with more limited evidence at the time of the midterm evaluation that it was making progress towards achieving the right results

Business · Economic growth · Economics · Global health · Health care · Health services research · International health · Political science · Public health · Public relations · Workforce · Workforce development · Disaster Response and Management · Global Security and Public Health · Medicine · Nursing · Public Administration · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research · Health Policy

• Construction of public health core competence and the improvement of its legal guarantee in China

  Open Access•Lansong Huang, Qinglin Yu et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  Añadir item

• Evaluating the Productivity of Collaborative Governance Regimes

  Kirk Emerson, Tina Nabatchi•Public Performance & Management…•2015

  Añadir item

• A comparison of 2020 health policy responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in Canada, Ireland, the United Kingdom and the United States of America

  Open Access•Lynn Unruh, Sara Allin et al.•Health Policy•2022

  Añadir item

• Evaluating implementation of International Health Regulations core capacities

  Open Access•Ahmed Razavi, Samuel Collins et al.•Globalization and Health•2021

  Añadir item

• A Framework for Understanding Aid Effectiveness Determinants, Strategies and Tradeoffs

  Open Access•Stephen Howe•Asia & the Pacific Policy Studies•2013

  Añadir item

• An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance

  Kirk Emerson, Tina Nabatchi et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2012

  Añadir item

• Complexity fosters learning in collaborative adaptive management

  Open Access•María E Fernández-Giménez, David J Augustine et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  Añadir item