Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Do We Recognise Deleuze and Simondon Are Spinozists

Bibliographic Data

ID19536283
AuthorsDavid Scott (0000-0002-4176-0466, Coppin State University, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume11
Issue4
Pages555-579
Publication date2017-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueDeleuze Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1750-2241 • E-ISSN: 1755-1684
PublisherEdinburgh University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.3366/dls.2017.0285
OpenAlexW2766809000
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited4

While typically unapologetic in expressing admiration, notably Gilles Deleuze admits his concern one time, in passing, that Gilbert Simondon's thought might hide a pernicious kind of ‘disguised moralism’, in which the form of the transcendent (‘God’, ‘Man’, ‘Ideas’) lurks, the enemy of the philosophy of immanence. Might there in fact be an ulterior motive in Deleuze's concern? But might this potential critique invite its own reversal? That is, might Deleuze's accusation be in fact a strategy for teasing out what, perhaps, is unrecognisable as such, but structurally essential for how Simondon constructs his onto-epistemological goals? Moreover, might this Simondonian response, unmasked, not only deflect but anticipate a ‘critique’ like Deleuze's? Extending this question further reveals I believe the implications for Simondon's ‘ethics without morality’, bringing him closer to Deleuze's interpretation of Spinoza. As a result, Deleuze's ‘critique’ invites the question: ‘What exactly is Spinozan in Simondon's ethics?’ Such a question compels our re-evaluation of humanism, its underlying prerogatives, if now in light of its consequences, the re-evaluation of poststructuralism: first, because it is predicated on the critique of the humanistic subject and, second, because ‘poststructuralism’ has come to designate how Simondon's relatedness is determined to Deleuze

Epistemology · Humanism · Immanence · Morality · Presupposition · Theology · Marxism and Critical Theory · Neurology and Historical Studies · Philosophical and Theoretical Analysis · Philosophy

  • Deleuzian posthuman ethics

    Ting Pei•Ethics and Education•2025

  • From Form to In-formation

    Open Access•J J Sylvia, J J Sylvia IV•Deleuze and Guattari Studies•2022

  • On the ethical dimension of irregular migrants’ lives

    Open Access•Miriam Tedeschi•Dialogues in Human Geography•2020

  • Simondon and Bohm between determinism and indeterminism

    Open Access•Andrej Jovićević•Filozofija i drustvo•2022

  • Sur la technique

    Gilbert Simondon•Sur la technique (1953-1983)•2014

  • A Spinoza Reader

    Open Access•Benedictus De Spinoza, Benedict de Spinoza et al.•Spinoza Reader•1994

  • L'anthropologie philosophique et l'anthropologie historique en débat

    Étienne Balibar, Gunter Gebauer et al.•Rue Descartes•2012

  • Structuralism

    Étienne Balibar•differences•2003

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0.67
Citation span2020 - 2025 (6)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae