Perceived benefits and risks of developing mixed communities in New Zealand

Implementer perspectives

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19536882
AutoresElinor Chisholm (0000-0001-6720-0283, University of Otago, autor de correspondencia), Nevil Pierse (0000-0002-2726-8141, University of Otago), Philippa Howden-Chapman (0000-0002-1529-6735, University of Otago)
Año2022
Volumen15
Número2
Páginas275-298
Fecha de publicación2022-03-15
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaUrban Research & Practice (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 1753-5069 • E-ISSN: 1753-5077
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/17535069.2020.1801831
OpenAlexW3047449277
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas5
Referencias citadas49

AbtsractIn New Zealand, mixed communities are developed on green fields or to replace existing public housing as a way of increasing housing supply, and, in some views, improving outcomes for low-income residents. This paper identifies the effects of developing mixed communities as perceived by implementers of these projects – politicians, officials, developers, and housing providers – and places these in the context of the international evidence. The range of perspectives on potential benefits and risks of mixed-income development for public tenants, the mixed evidence base, and uncertainty about the applicability of research evidence across different urban contexts should inform a research agenda

Business · Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental planning · Geography · Political science · demographic modeling and climate adaptation · Rural development and sustainability · Urban, Neighborhood, and Segregation Studies