Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Texting and the brain

The time-course of social brain activation in face-to-face versus text-based computer-mediated-communication

Bibliographic Data

ID19537837
AuthorsRaul Sacristan (University of Salford), Sam Royle (0000-0002-3170-3759, University of Salford), Adam Galpin (0000-0002-7699-8706, University of Salford)
Year2023
Volume17
Issue4
Publication date2023-09-18
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueCyberpsychology Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1802-7962 • E-ISSN: 1802-7962
PublisherMasaryk University Press (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5817/cp2023-4-3
OpenAlexW4386834729
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited62

Through evolution, humans have adapted their interactions to face-to-face communication, supported by a network of neural systems which facilitate the transmission and interpretation of social signals for successful communication. However, emerging methods of mediated communication are rapidly shifting our communication habits. For instance, text messaging has become a dominant mode of communication, surpassing face-to-face interaction in some contexts. This study explored differences in neural activation between face-to-face (FtF) and text-based computer-mediated communication (CMC) during a conversation between two communication partners. Seventeen pairs of participants were recruited and each pair undertook a ten-minute conversation in each communication condition. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy was utilized to measure neural activity in two relevant neural structures involved in social cognition: the ventro-medial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), and the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC). The results indicated that text-based CMC generated more activity in dmPFC relative to FtF. No overall differences were observed between text-based CMC and FtF conditions in the vmPFC, although a linear trend existed across time showing increasing activation through the conversation in the FtF condition only. The results suggest there are differences in neural activations in key brain regions involved in social cognition and highlight the utility of brain imaging to reveal the way neural systems are engaged in different communication contexts. Understanding these differences in neural activation can provide insight into how the brain processes different communication methods and guide us to build tools that will aid text-based communication to provide more naturalistic experiences

Brain activity and meditation · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Cognitive science · Computer-mediated communication · Conversation · Electroencephalography · Linguistics · Neural activity · Prefrontal cortex · Action Observation and Synchronization · Communication · Computer Science · Face Recognition and Perception · Neuroscience · Psychology

  • Evaluating the emotional impact of virtual expressions

    Li Meng, Liang-yu Meng et al.•Behaviour and Information…•2026

  • Empathy Mediates the Link Between Extraversion and Latent Semantic Similarity in Computer-Mediated Discussions of a Politically Contentious Topic

    Open Access•Vivian P Ta, Vivian P Ta-Johnson et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2026

  • Cognitive neuroscience of human social behaviour

    Open Access•Ralph Adolphs•Nature Reviews Neuroscience•2003

  • Functional imaging of ‘theory of mind’

    Open Access•Helen L Gallagher, Chris Frith et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2003

  • Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements

    Open Access•Michael Koenigs, L Young et al.•Nature•2007

  • Development and neurophysiology of mentalizing

    Open Access•Uta Frith, Chris Frith et al.•Philosophical Transactions of the…•2003

  • Why is conversation so easy?

    Open Access•Simon Garrod, Martin J Pickering•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2004

  • Social Cognition in Humans

    Open Access•Chris Frith, Chris D Frith et al.•Current Biology•2007

  • Brain-to-brain coupling

    Open Access•Uri Hasson, Asif A Ghazanfar et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2012

  • Social Cognitive Neuroscience

    Matthew D Lieberman•Annual Review of Psychology•2007

  • Meeting of minds

    Open Access•David M Amodio, Chris Frith et al.•Nature Reviews Neuroscience•2006

  • Speaker–listener neural coupling underlies successful communication

    Open Access•Greg J Stephens, Lauren J Silbert et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2010

  • Organizational Information Requirements, Media Richness and Structural Design

    Open Access•Richard L Daft, Robert H Lengel•Management Science•1986

  • Alignment in social interactions

    Open Access•Mattia Gallotti, Merle T Fairhurst et al.•Consciousness and Cognition•2017

  • Inference of attitudes from nonverbal communication in two channels

    Albert Mehrabian, Susan R Ferris•Journal of Consulting Psychology•1967

  • The effects of text, audio, video, and in-person communication on bonding between friends

    Open Access•Lauren E Sherman, Minas Michikyan et al.•Cyberpsychology Journal of…•2013

  • The social brain hypothesis

    Open Access•R I M Dunbar•Evolutionary Anthropology Issues…•1998

  • Facial expression and emotion

    Paul Ekman•American Psychologist•1993

  • The chameleon effect

    Tanya L Chartrand, John A Bargh•Journal of Personality and Social…•1999

  • The Social Brain

    Ralph Adolphs•Annual Review of Psychology•2008

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae