Reporting guidelines should be free to publish, read, and use
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19550472 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Patricia Logullo (0000-0001-8708-7003, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Jennifer Anne de Beyer (0000-0002-3547-4973, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre), Shona Kirtley (0000-0002-7801-5777, University of Oxford), Caroline Struthers (0000-0003-0848-9894, University of Oxford), Gary S Collins (0000-0002-2772-2316, John Radcliffe Hospital) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 0203107-0203107 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Global Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2047-2978 • E-ISSN: 2047-2986 |
| Publisher | International Society of Global Health (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.7189/jogh.10.0203107 |
| PMID | 33437467 |
| OpenAlex | W3110823709 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 8 |
eporting guidelines are important tools aimed at improving transparency and reproducibility in health research However, many reporting guidelines are currently hidden behind paywalls and restrictive copyright licences, which is in direct opposition to their stated goal. The UK EQUA-TOR Centre (https://www.equator-network.org/about-us/uk-equator-centre/) argues that tools created to improve transparency in research should be freely accessible for all researchers to read, share, use, and build upon and that publishers should facilitate this by waiving article processing charges (APCs) from reporting guidelines
Alternative medicine · Checklist · Library science · Political science · Public relations · Publication · Publishing · Scientific Misconduct · Clinical practice guidelines implementation · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Law · Medicine · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|