A laboratory-focussed desk review of health systems in Uganda, Kenya, and the UK to respond to current and future pandemics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19550603 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Winters Muttamba (0000-0001-7154-2964, University of St Andrews), Bernadette O’hare (0000-0003-1730-7941, University of St Andrews), Andrew Ramsay (0000-0002-1451-8973, University of St Andrews), Vibhor Saxena (0000-0001-9411-5527, University of St Andrews), Bruce Kirenga (0000-0002-2023-2840, Malaria Consortium), Wilber Sabiiti (0000-0002-4742-2791, University of St Andrews) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 15 |
| Pages | 04194-04194 |
| Publication date | 2025-08-29 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Global Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2047-2978 • E-ISSN: 2047-2986 |
| Publisher | International Society of Global Health (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.7189/jogh.15.04194 |
| PMID | 40879599 |
| OpenAlex | W4413826375 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 58 |
Background: Laboratory systems play a crucial role in managing diseases effectively, and the COVID-19 pandemic serves as a prime example. The pandemic underscored the need to make laboratory health systems more resilient and robust to respond to future pandemics. Methods: We conducted a desk review guided by the six World Health Organization health system building blocks (health service delivery, health financing, medical products, vaccines, and technologies, human resources for health, governance, and health information systems). Results: The three countries' strengths include health information systems, well-established reference laboratories, mobile and community-level testing, a vibrant private laboratory sector in Uganda and Kenya, and a growing private sector in the UK. In Uganda and Kenya, there are laboratory connectivity solutions for molecular diagnostics, multi-disease testing platforms and specimen referral systems, while in the UK, there are hub-and-spoke networks. Weaknesses in Uganda and Kenya include vertical laboratory systems strengthening, ill-equipped laboratories, constrained and inequitable distribution of laboratory human resources, and limited data use. In the UK, there is chronic underfunding and undervaluing of disciplines supporting infection testing, microbiology and virology. Conclusions: The growing contribution of the private sector in the three countries and the deployment of multi-disease testing platforms should be supported, given the advantage of shared financial costs in the face of chronic underfunding for laboratory systems
2019-20 coronavirus outbreak · Desk · Disease · Environmental health · Pandemic · Pathology · Political science · Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control · Engineering · Medicine · SARS-CoV-2 detection and testing · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research · Virology
Laboratory-based surveillance of antimicrobial resistance in regions of Kenya
Unlocking the health system barriers to maximise the uptake and utilisation of molecular diagnostics in low-income and middle-income country setting
Performance assessment of the county healthcare systems in Kenya
The impact of decentralisation on health systems
Covid-19 self-testing
Beyond pilotitis
Information asymmetry in the Kenyan medical laboratory sector
Does decentralization of health systems translate into decentralization of authority? A decision space analysis of Ugandan healthcare facilities
The Role of Clinical Laboratories in Emerging Pathogens—Insights From the Covid-19 Pandemic
Global Estimates of Lives and Life-Years Saved by Covid-19 Vaccination During 2020-2024
Barriers to the Digitization of Health Information
Use of technology for public health surveillance reporting
Building laboratory capacity to detect and characterize pathogens of public and global health security concern in Kenya
| Highly cited | No |
|---|