The contribution of community health systems to resilience

Case study of the response to the 2015 earthquake in Nepal

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19550763
AutoresAngeli Rawat (0000-0002-1313-2796, University of British Columbia), Asha Pun (0000-0002-0257-0205, UNICEF Nepal Country Office, Kathmandu, Nepal), KC Ashish (Uppsala University), Indra K Tamang (UNICEF Nepal Country Office, Kathmandu, Nepal), Jonas Karlström (0000-0002-7279-428X, United Nations Children's Fund), Katrina Hsu (0000-0002-8380-5415, Providence Health Care), Kumanan Rasanathan (0000-0001-9347-1765, United Nations Children's Fund)
Ano2023
Volume13
Páginas04048-04048
Data de publicação2023-05-12
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Global Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2047-2978 • E-ISSN: 2047-2986
EditoraInternational Society of Global Health (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.7189/jogh.13.04048
PMID37166272
OpenAlexW4376132654
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas5
Referências citadas38

Methods: Key informant interviews and focus group discussions were utilised. Participants included FCHVs, primary healthcare workers, community leaders and mothers, district health managers, representatives from the Ministry of Health and Population, multilateral health organisations, bilateral development partners, local non-governmental organisations, community-based organisations, and international non-governmental organisations. We used thematic content analysis to identify emerging themes. Results: Seventy-seven people participated in the study in September 2016 from communities (n = 53, 69%), districts (n = 8, 10%), and national levels (n = 16, 21%). Strong coordination, international and national support, and community engagement and participation were reported as successes of the earthquake response. Challenges included a lack of preparedness and supplies, a lack of earthquake-resistant infrastructure, and the centralisation of the response. FCHVs continued to work, despite being victims of the earthquake themselves. Facilitators of the continuation of the FCHVs' duties included their strong ties with the communities and facilities, international support, and the ability to mobilise existing community resources. Barriers included fear, communities' attitudes, high workloads, large geographic distances, and difficult geography. Participants identified the importance of having strong, connected, and supported communities, adaptable funding and policies, and decentralised decision-making within strong health systems. Conclusions: Building resilience in community-based health systems must start with strong communities that are prepared, trained, equipped, and empowered. Health systems must be decentralised and adaptable, with strong coordination and leadership. Capable community health workers such as FCHVs were an important part of building resilience during the earthquake. These lessons can assist countries in strengthening decentralised health systems to better respond to a multitude of shocks, while still providing essential health services for communities

Community resilience · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Disaster Response and Management · Environmental Science · Medicine · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research