Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Assessing governance structures for climate-resilient and sustainable health systems

Development of the PHONIC framework

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19552143
AutoresKarin Geffert (0000-0003-2359-7412, Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands)), Annkathrin von der Haar (Planet), Marie Jung (Planet), Melvine Anyango Otieno (0000-0001-9241-9180, University of Eldoret), Eva Rehfue (0000-0002-4318-8846, Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands)), Eva Rehfuess (Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München), Alexandra Schneider (0000-0002-1084-2442, Helmholtz Zentrum München), Maike Voss (0000-0002-7534-6722, Institut für Handelsforschung), Isabelle von Polenz (0009-0002-6288-5134, Zimmer Biomet (Netherlands)), Franziska Matthies-Wiesler (Helmholtz Zentrum München)
Ano2026
Volume16
Páginas04083-04083
Data de publicação2026-05-29
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Global Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2047-2978 • E-ISSN: 2047-2986
EditoraInternational Society of Global Health (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.7189/jogh.16.04083
PMID42212583
OpenAlexW7162758150
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas18

Background: The consequences of climate change have detrimental effects on human health. The establishment of functional governance structures is considered crucial for addressing health challenges, as such structures provide the foundation for coordinated and coherent action. At present, no standardised and internationally applicable approach exists for assessing and benchmarking governance structures for climate and health at national level. Therefore, the objective of this study was to develop the PHONIC framework, a tool designed to assess governance structures for climate-resilient and sustainable health systems. Methods: We followed a four-step approach: First, we selected a methodology, originally designed for assessing food environment policies, and assessed its applicability to governance structures for health and climate change. This methodology comprises five key stages, as well as a set of indicators and a catalogue of good practice examples. Second, we identified and adapted existing indicators, through online consultations with international experts, and collated good practice examples for the assessment of governance structures for climate-resilient and sustainable health systems. Third, we piloted the framework with national expert groups in two countries, Germany and Kenya. Finally, we evaluated the PHONIC framework's application and revised the methodology based on the findings from the pilot phase. Results: The final PHONIC framework includes a set of ten indicators across three thematic areas: three indicators focused on governance, four on policy development, and three on cross-sectoral collaboration. In addition, we compiled a catalogue of good practice examples for climate-resilient and sustainable health systems, currently comprising 47 examples from 32 countries. The piloting revealed opportunities, such as the participatory process, but also challenges regarding the narrow focus on health systems. Conclusions: The PHONIC framework, with its participatory and adaptable approach, enables the benchmarking and comprehensive analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of governance structures for climate-resilient and sustainable health systems at country level. The potential of the framework could be expanded by including international experts from a broader geographic scope and systematic searches for good practice examples. Decision makers in the health sector can use the outcomes of the PHONIC framework to identify the most relevant areas and actions for improvement of their climate change and health governance

Climate change · Corporate governance · Global health · Human health · Mental health · Psychosocial · Sustainable development · Vulnerability (computing) · Climate Change and Health Impacts · Healthcare Facilities Design and Sustainability · Zoonotic diseases and public health

  • Framework for assessing governance of the health system in developing countries

    Open Access•Sameen Siddiqi, Tayyeb I Masud et al.•Health Policy•2009

  • Governance and Capacity to Manage Resilience of Health Systems

    Open Access•Karl Blanchet, Sara L Nam et al.•International Journal of Health…•2017

  • Monitoring and benchmarking government policies and actions to improve the healthiness of food environments

    Open Access•B Swinburn, Stefanie Vandevijvere et al.•Obesity Reviews•2013

  • The 2020 report of The Lancet Countdown on health and climate change

    Open Access•Nick Watts, Markus Amann et al.•The Lancet•2021

  • The 2022 report of the Lancet Countdown on health and climate change

    Open Access•Marina Romanello, Claudia Di Napoli et al.•The Lancet•2022

  • The Quality of Mixed Methods Studies in Health Services Research

    Open Access•Alicia O’cathain, Alicia O'Cathain et al.•Journal of Health Services…•2008

  • A multi-layered governance framework for incorporating social science insights into adapting to the health impacts of climate change

    Open Access•Kayla Bowen, Kathryn J Bowen et al.•Global Health Action•2013

  • Governing complexity

    Open Access•Niko Soininen, J B Ruhl et al.•Environmental Innovation and…•2025

  • Frameworks to assess health systems governance

    Open Access•Thidar Pyone, Helen Smith et al.•Health Policy and Planning•2017

  • The politics of numbers

    Open Access•André Broome, Joel Quirk•Review of International Studies•2015

  • Defining the Functions of Public Health Governance

    Valeria Carlson, Valeria P Carlson et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2015

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae