Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring the asymmetric coding of autobenefactive in Lithuanian and beyond

Bibliographic Data

ID19557001
AuthorsVladimir Panov (Vilnius University, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume11
Publication date2020-12-30
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBaltic Linguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2081-7533
PublisherUniversity of Warsaw (PUBLISHER • PL)
DOI10.32798/bl.707
OpenAlexW3127068071
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited10

In this paper, I investigate a group of semantically close functions marked by the Reflexive marker in Lithuanian, which I address as autobenefactive. I provide a classification of these functions and then turn to a marking asymmetry which is characteristic of the them, namely the tendency to occur in perfective contexts and not to occur in progressive contexts. On the basis of a questionnaire, I show that this tendency indeed exists, although different verbs are involved to different degrees, and we are presumably witnessing an ongoing grammaticalization process. I then compare the Lithuanian marking asymmetry to a phenomenon in Georgian, in which the use of “subjective version” exhibits a similar kind of asymmetry with some groups of verbs. In the concluding section, I propose a typological explanation of the observed asymmetry, hypothesizing that the markers of both languages function in a way parallel to so-called “bounders” – telicizers with primary spatial meanings

Asymmetry · Epistemology · Georgian · Grammaticalization · Linguistics · Lithuanian · Phenomenon · Physics · Reflexivity · Sociology · Linguistics and language evolution · Linguistics, Language Diversity, and Identity · Philosophy · Psychology · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • BE-perfects and grammaticalization in Bulgarian and Lithuanian

    Open Access•Danguolė Kotryna Kapkan•Studies in Language•2026

  • Perfect in Lithuanian

    Open Access•Danguolė Kotryna Kapkan•Baltic Linguistics•2022

  • Untangling the functions of aspectual distinctions in the Lithuanian imperative against the background of Slavonic

    Open Access•Vladimir Panov•Baltic Linguistics•2022

  • The Category of Aspect in Georgian, Ossetic and Russian. Some areal and typological observations

    Vittorio Tomelleri, Vittorio Springfield Tomelleri•Faits de langues•2009

  • The Creation of Tense and Aspect Systems in the Languages of the World

    Joan L Bybee, Joan Bybee et al.•Studies in Language•1989

  • Path to Realization

    Open Access•Léonard Talmy•Proceedings of the Annual Meeting…•1991

  • The spontaneous-autobenefactive prefix in Japhug Rgyalrong

    Guillaume Jacques•Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman…•2015

  • On the grammaticalization of personal pronouns

    Open Access•Bernd Heine, Kyung-An Song•Journal of Linguistics•2011

  • Georgian syntax

    Open Access•B G Hewitt•Lingua•1983

  • Split case-marking patterns in verb-types and tense/aspect/mood

    Open Access•Tsunoda Tasaku•Linguistics•1981

  • Comparative concepts and descriptive categories in crosslinguistic studies

    Open Access•Martin Haspelmath•Language•2010

  • Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse

    Paul J Hopper, Scott A Thompson et al.•Language•1980

Citations per year0.75
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae