The Jerusalem temple between “theology” and archaeology

Which issues, what dialogue

Bibliographic Data

ID19558794
AuthorsFabio Porzia (0000-0003-1031-2692, Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès), Carole Bonnet (0000-0003-2770-7914, Université Toulouse - Jean Jaurès)
Year2017
Volume9
Publication date2017-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePalethnologie (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2108-6532 • E-ISSN: 2108-6532
PublisherOpenEdition (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4000/palethnologie.336
OpenAlexW2901064761
LanguageEN
References cited18

Divine presence on earth constitutes an aporia. However, it is also necessary, since that which we call “religion” is simply a series of social practices which aim to establish a line of communication, benevolent if possible, between superior beings and mankind. Ontologically speaking, divine powers are “superhuman”, which means that common parameters do not apply to them. This paper explores the first temple of Jerusalem using two sources: textual and archaeological evidence. We will therefore compare the theological and archaeological data in order to analyse the interactions between these two disciplines. The place of worship appears to be an ideal laboratory where several disciplines, methodologies and issues can be brought together to understand representations of divinity. In other words, we will explore how the consideration of “discourses about the gods” (theo-logy) can enhance the work of archaeologists and raise new questions: inversely, we will highlight that which archaeology contributes to those who conduct research into the representation of divinity in the texts

Ancient history · Archaeology · Divinity · Epistemology · Sociology · Temple · Theology · Worship · Anthropology · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Law · Philosophy

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access