Track Thyself? The Value and Ethics of Self-knowledge Through Technology
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19563271 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Muriel Leuenberger (0000-0002-5427-0108, University of Zurich, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 13-13 |
| Publication date | 2024-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Philosophy & Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2210-5433 • E-ISSN: 2210-5441 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s13347-024-00704-4 |
| PMID | 38288051 |
| OpenAlex | W4391282132 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 49 |
Novel technological devices, applications, and algorithms can provide us with a vast amount of personal information about ourselves. Given that we have ethical and practical reasons to pursue self-knowledge, should we use technology to increase our self-knowledge? And which ethical issues arise from the pursuit of technologically sourced self-knowledge? In this paper, I explore these questions in relation to bioinformation technologies (health and activity trackers, DTC genetic testing, and DTC neurotechnologies) and algorithmic profiling used for recommender systems, targeted advertising, and technologically supported decision-making. First, I distinguish between impersonal, critical, and relational self-knowledge. Relational self-knowledge is a so far neglected dimension of self-knowledge which is introduced in this paper. Next, I investigate the contribution of these technologies to the three types of self-knowledge and uncover the connected ethical concerns. Technology can provide a lot of impersonal self-knowledge, but we should focus on the quality of the information which tends to be particularly insufficient for marginalized groups. In terms of critical self-knowledge, the nature of technologically sourced personal information typically impedes critical engagement. The value of relational self-knowledge speaks in favour of transparency of information technology, notably for algorithms that are involved in decision-making about individuals. Moreover, bioinformation technologies and digital profiling shape the concepts and norms that define us. We should ensure they not only serve commercial interests but our identity and self-knowledge interests
Computer security · Epistemology · Information technology · Knowledge management · Philosophy of science · Philosophy of technology · Self · Self-knowledge · Computer Science · Ethics and Social Impacts of AI · Ethics in Clinical Research · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Psychology
Technology and Privacy
Human Identity and Bioethics
Immanuel Kant: Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals
Our Entitlement to Self-Knowledge
The making of autobiographical memory
Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person
Judgment under Uncertainty
Relational Autonomy
Technology, Personal Information, and Identity
Criminal justice, artificial intelligence systems, and human rights
In Defense of Narrative Authenticity
Ethics of AI-Enabled Recruiting and Selection
Obfuscation
The Digital Phenotype
Giving an Account of Oneself
Genes, genomes and identity. Projections on matter
You can’t really control life’
On Knowing One's Own Mind
Predictions of Dangerousness in Sentencing
Nothing personal
Data identity
Self-Knowledge and Self-Love
Sources of the self
Challenging algorithmic profiling
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |