Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Ijon Practice on Landowner Rice Farming; Agency-Structure Perspective

Bibliographic Data

ID19566515
AuthorsFaidah Azuz (Universitas Bosowa), NURMI NONCI (0000-0002-7220-637X, Universitas Bosowa), Abdul Malik Iskandar (0000-0001-7191-3606), Syamsul Bachri (0000-0003-4576-5616, Universitas Bosowa), Muhammad Masdar, Harifuddin Harifuddin (Universitas Bosowa), Fidaan Husein Azuz (Universitas Bosowa)
Year2023
Volume11
Issue2
Pages154-167
Publication date2023-11-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSodality Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2302-7517 • E-ISSN: 2302-7525
PublisherDepartment of Communication and Community Development Sciences (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.22500/11202344433
OpenAlexW4388647359
LanguageEN
References cited33

The status of farmers in the socio-economic study of agriculture referring to land ownership consists of landowner farmer, tenant farmer, and sharecropper. Landowner farmer holds the highest position. Many landowner farmers have been trapped in “Ijon” practice for years, which makes them work on their own land to pay their debts for a long period of time. The purpose of this study is to find out the background of farmers who were involved in the ijon practice, the reasons behind their entanglement in the ijon practice, the uses of loans, and how the loans were paid. The study location was village of XYZ in East Nusa Tenggara Province, involving 22 farmers who were involved in the practice of ijon. This study used a qualitative analysis of agency structure from Gidden’s perspective. This paper concludes that farmers were involved in the ijon practice to meet urgent non-productive needs. Most of the farmers’ earnings are used to pay debts. Farmers who are trapped in the ijon system for a long period of time will bear the status of “the landowner farmers who work as farm laborers on their own land.” This status has yet to be categorized in the agricultural economic approach

Agricultural economics · Agricultural science · Agriculture · Business · Debt · Earnings · Economics · Geography · Land tenure · Sharecropping · Sociology · Agricultural Innovations and Practices · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Land Rights and Reforms · Finance

  • Examining sources of land tenure (in)security. A focus on authority relations, state politics, social dynamics and belonging

    Open Access•Anni Valkonen•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Anthony Giddens and structuration theory

    Ira Chatterjee, Jagat Kunwar et al.•Management, Organizations and…•2019

  • Social acceptance of dual land use approaches

    Open Access•Gabriele Torma, Jessica Aschemann‐witzel•Journal of Rural Studies•2023

  • Social multi-criteria evaluation of land-use scenarios in the Chaco Salteño

    Open Access•Elena Zepharovich, Michele Graziano Ceddia et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • How does land consolidation drive rural industrial development? Qualitative and quantitative analysis of 32 land consolidation cases in China

    Open Access•Ge Wang, Xiaoqiu Li et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • Do farmers care about rented land? A multi-method study on land tenure and soil conservation

    Open Access•Heidi Leonhardt, Marianne Penker et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Rural Credit

    Ace Partadireja•Bulletin of Indonesian Economic…•1974

  • Crisis and Differentiation among Small-Scale Sugar Cane Growers in Nkomazi, South Africa

    Open Access•Paul James, Philip Woodhouse•Journal of Southern African Studies•2017

  • The Moral Economy of the Peasant

    James C Scott•Moral Economy of the Peasant•2017

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae