Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Geochemistry of Intrusive Sediment Sampled from the 1 st Century CE Inscribed Ossuaries of James and the Talpiot Tomb, Jerusalem

Bibliographic Data

ID19570239
AuthorsAryeh E Shimron (Geological Survey of Israel, corresponding author), M Shirav (0000-0002-9009-8173, Geological Survey of Israel), Kevin T Kilty (University of Wyoming), Ludwik Halicz (Geological Survey of Israel), Rolf B Pedersen (University of Bergen), Harald Furnes (0000-0003-1081-9610, University of Bergen)
Year2020
Volume08
Issue01
Pages92-115
Publication date2020-01-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueArchaeological Discovery (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2331-1959 • E-ISSN: 2331-1967
PublisherScientific Research Publishing, Inc. (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.4236/ad.2020.81006
OpenAlexW2994257150
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited6

In 2002 an ossuary of unknown provenance was revealed to the public during a press conference; it is inscribed “James son of Joseph brother of Jesus”. Because its inscription seems to refer to a member of the Jesus of Nazareth’s family, it is natural to wonder what relationship this ossuary could have to the Talpiot tomb. Discovered in 1980 during construction operations in SE Jerusalem, the tomb contained several ossuaries inscribed with names from the Jesus family. In pursuit of physical evidence regarding such a relationship, we investigated the geochemistry of the James ossuary’s sediment which accumulated through millennia in its interior. For comparison, we similarly investigated samples of material from ossuaries taken from the Talpiot tomb, and also from a wide sample of ossuaries from other tombs in the Jerusalem area. Our purpose was to answer, if possible, two questions. First, is the chemistry of the inorganic materials (soils) which were flushed into the Talpiot tomb and ossuaries therein distinct from other ossuaries removed from tombs in the Jerusalem area? Second, presuming such a distinction exists, does the geochemistry of the materials from the James ossuary resemble either grouping? While we recognize the controversies surrounding both the origin and inscription of the James ossuary and the interpretation of the Talpiot tomb inscriptions, this geochemical evidence is worth investigation and discussion on its own merits. Employing chemical (ICP, SEM and Pb isotope) analyses we have found, based on chemical data alone, that the ossuary of James is far more similar to ossuaries removed from the Talpiot tomb than it is to any other group of ossuaries we sampled

Ancient history · Archaeology · Art · Brother · Inscribed figure · Theology · Wonder · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Classics · Heavy metals in environment · History · Philosophy · Geology

  • Petrochemistry of Sediment and Organic Materials Sampled from Ossuaries and Two Nails from the Tomb of the Family of the High Priest Caiaphas, Jerusalem

    Open Access•Aryeh E Shimron, Yoetz Deutsch et al.•Archaeological Discovery•2020

  • Authenticity examination of the inscription on the ossuary attributed to James, brother of Jesus

    Open Access•Avner Ayalon, Miryam Bar‐matthew et al.•Journal of Archaeological Science•2004

Citations per year0.17
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae