Virtuous Governance and the Chinese Way

Lucian W. Pye, the renowned American Sinologist, argues that power/authority in Chinese culture follows a paternalistic structure, that the distinction in Chinese society between public and private has historically been in a state of tension, and therefore that Chinese governance has always emphasized central power over local self-governance, suppressed cultural pluralism, and rebuffed multipolar structures of power. Even though the inherent tension identified by Pye certainly exists, the thesis that Chinese culture has a deeply ingrained authoritarian orientation is simply incorrect. In order to resolve the tension between the public and private realms, Chinese thinkers—from the various strands of legalist thought to the Confucian notion of “kingly governance”—have premised the division of power on the priority of preserving centralized power. In other words, diffusion of power has been premised on the idea of an already collectivized authority. Therefore, the power structure that defines Chinese culture has certainly not been the polycentric one that Pye implicitly values, but neither has it been the centralist, authoritarian structure that he abhors. Rather, it has been the Confucian model premised on the values of governance through ritual and moral virtue. Insights from cultural psychology help explain ethical governance—that is, rule by an ethical meritocracy—in Chinese society and culture

Authoritarianism · China · Chinese culture · Corporate governance · Democracy · Epistemology · Law and economics · Management · Meritocracy · Paternalism · Political science · Politics · Sinology · Sociology · Virtue · Chinese history and philosophy · Cultural Differences and Values · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Law · Philosophy

• Culture's consequences

  Geert H Hofstede, Geert Hofstede•Culture's consequences•1980

  Incluir item

• Where (Who) Are Collectives in Collectivism? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and Collectivism.

  Marilynn B Brewer, Ya-Ru Chen•Psychological Review•2007

  Incluir item

• The Deep Structure of Confucianism

  K K Hwang, Kwang-Kuo Hwang•Asian Philosophy•2001

  Incluir item

• The Rise of Local History

  Peter K Bol•Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies•2001

  Incluir item

• The impact of cultural collectivism on reward allocation

  Kwok Leung, Michael Harris Bond•Journal of Personality and Social…•1984

  Incluir item

• Asian Values and Human Rights

  Donald Zagoria, Donald S Zagoria et al.•Foreign Affairs•1998

  Incluir item

• Li and Moral Justification

  A S Cua, A S•Philosophy East and West•1983

  Incluir item

• Dimensions of Li (Propriety)

  A S Cua, Alya Az Zahra S•Philosophy East and West•1979

  Incluir item

• Some Observations on a Chinese Public Sphere

  Open Access•Mary Backus Rankin•Modern China•1993

  Incluir item

• The Problem of "Civil Society" in Late Imperial China

  Open Access•William T Rowe•Modern China•1993

  Incluir item

• The Civil Society and Public Sphere Debate

  Open Access•Frederic Wakeman•Modern China•1993

  Incluir item

• Chinese Relationalism

  Open Access•K K Hwang, Kwang‐Kuo Hwang•Journal for the Theory of Social…•2000

  Incluir item

• Individualism-Collectivism

  Open Access•Yvonne A Fjneman, Madde E Willemsen et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•1996

  Incluir item

• How Does Cultural Collectivism Operate

  Open Access•Michael Harris Bond, Kwok Leung et al.•Journal of Cross-Cultural…•1982

  Incluir item

• Face and Favor

  K K Hwang, Kwang-Kuo Hwang•American Journal of Sociology•1987

  Incluir item