Vertical Democratic Meritocracy in China
Response to Comments
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19570581 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Daniel A Bell (0000-0002-5521-3383, Shandong University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 111-123 |
| Publication date | 2018-08-14 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Chinese Humanities (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2352-1333 • E-ISSN: 2352-1341 |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1163/23521341-12340060 |
| OpenAlex | W2889138389 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 3 |
The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy1 has generated much heat and light. The first two comments-by Huang Yushun and Liu Jingxi-generate heat and the second two commentsby Zhang Yongle and Cao Feng-generate light. I take special pleasure in the comments that generate light because I can learn from them. But I also need to respond to comments that generate heat because it is important to clarify misunderstandings and to spell out areas of irreconcilable differences. Let me begin by discussing the first two comments, and then I will say what I have learned from the last two comments.2 For reasons of space, I
China · Democracy · Economics · Epistemology · Meritocracy · Pleasure · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Proposition · Sociology · Spell · Zhàng · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · Chinese history and philosophy · Law · Philosophy · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|