Indigenous Legal Traditions
Dados Bibliográficos
AUTOR(ES) | |
---|---|
AFILIAÇÃO(ÕES) | Goldsmiths, University of London |
ANO | 2008 |
TIPO | Book |
CITAÇÕES | 1 |
ADICIONADO EM | Não informado |
Resumo
In this response, I examine the ambiguity about the status of Membership Categorization Device Analysis (MCDA) in the work of Harvey Sacks. The 'five guiding principles' of MCDA that Stokoe enunciates serve as a crucial guide to future research. In what follows, I give some further examples of data analysis which, I believe, supports both her strong and weaker claims.