The Politicization of Regulatory Science
Science Transparency at the Trump Administration’s EPA
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19578917 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rose Zappacosta (University of Delaware), Casey L Taylor (0000-0002-5958-6259, University of Delaware) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Publication date | 2022-11-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Case Studies in the Environment (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2473-9510 • E-ISSN: 2473-9510 |
| Publisher | University of California Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1525/cse.2022.1800281 |
| OpenAlex | W4312881268 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 13 |
In this case study, we explore the Trump Administration’s 2018 “Strengthening Transparency in Regulatory Science” rule and investigate it as an example of the politics associated with how science is used in the regulatory process in the United States. Publicly, the administration claimed the rule would improve data and scientific quality, as well as lead to greater transparency in regulatory decisions made by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The rule’s many critics, including many scientific organizations and environmental groups, argued instead however that the rule was politically motivated, and only the latest attempt of many by regulated industries to interfere in the EPA’s use of science in its regulatory analysis and decision-making. They argued the true goal of the rule was instead to impede the agency’s mission by restricting its use of key public health studies and slowing its operations. The rule, which took effect in January 2021, was quickly vacated when the Biden Administration took office. Although this rule is no longer in place, it provides an illustrative example of the complicated relationship between politics and science, as well as of a political strategy often used by industry actors and political conservatives to avoid environmental regulations
Business · Economics · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Public relations · Regulatory agency · Regulatory reform · Regulatory science · Regulatory state · Rule of law · Sociology · Uncertainty · Climate Change and Health Impacts · Environmental Justice and Health Disparities · Global Public Health Policies and Epidemiology · Law · Medicine · Public Administration
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |