Systems thinking for complex recreation management
A case study in Moab, Utah, USA
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19579783 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Iree Wheeler (0000-0003-2776-2243, Utah State University, corresponding author), Wayne Freimund, Anna Miller (0009-0002-6186-9677), Anna B Miller (0000-0002-4919-8156, University of Wyoming) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 175-191 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Socio-Ecological Practice Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2524-5279 • E-ISSN: 2524-5287 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s42532-025-00219-y |
| OpenAlex | W4410918854 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 38 |
Previous research advocating for the use of systems thinking to tackle challenges in outdoor recreation management emphasizes the necessity for a paradigm shift in our perspectives and approaches to complex public land outdoor recreation management issues. This paper responds to appeals from other researchers to implement systems thinking in managing visitation and outdoor recreation on public lands. Specifically, it examines the interactions of public land recreation managers within a complex network of high-visitation public lands by utilizing systems thinking concepts and frameworks. Through this analysis, we found systems archetypes to be a valuable tool for illustrating how organizational scenarios are unfolding in the Moab, Utah, USA regional outdoor recreation-tourism system. This investigation revealed the isolated decisions made by individual agencies and highlighted the need for more proactive, collaborative regional-level visitor use and outdoor recreation planning instead of merely reacting to challenges. Overall, systems thinking served as a beneficial tool in this study. However, defining the system and outlining archetypes is merely the initial step. This process is iterative, complex, and necessitates considerable additional commitment from managers, researchers, and policymakers for the application of systems thinking in public land recreation management to be effectively realized in practice
Geography · Political science · Recreation · Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Applied Thematic Analysis
Starting to Untangle the Web of Cooperation, Coordination, and Collaboration
A Typology of Collaboration Efforts in Environmental Management
Memoing in qualitative research
A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems
Thematic analysis
What's ‘SUP’ with paddlers? Integrating spatial, social, and ecological data to understand behavior among paddlesport users at a popular lake destination
Using a social-ecological systems perspective to understand tourism and landscape interactions in coastal areas
Does Perceived Crowding Cause Winter Backcountry Recreationists to Displace
The world(s) we live in – Inter-agency collaboration in forest management
Facilitating collaboration in forest management
Natural Resource Agencies and Their Motivations to Partner
The practice of social research
A Framework to Analyze the Robustness of Social-ecological Systems from an Institutional Perspective
Culture Clash'' Revisited
| Highly cited | No |
|---|