Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using participatory scenario planning to explore the synergies and trade‐offs from upland treescape expansion

Bibliographic Data

ID19582272
AuthorsMelissa Minter (0000-0003-1580-7176, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, corresponding author), Susan Baker (0000-0002-5616-4157, Cardiff University), Euan Bowditch (0000-0003-3340-8160, University of the Highlands and Islands), Sheena Carlisle (0000-0002-0894-6832, Cardiff University), Natasha Louise Constant (0000-0002-1910-6791, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds), Alix Syder (0009-0009-7842-5328, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds), Tom Finch (0000-0003-1122-8513, Royal Society for the Protection of Birds)
Year2025
Publication date2025-03-14
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePeople and Nature (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2575-8314 • E-ISSN: 2575-8314
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/pan3.70025
OpenAlexW4408485304
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited52

The future of land use in the UK uplands is highly debated, with growing interest in increasing tree cover and other land use changes, alongside a desire to maintain traditional land use patterns and practices. Treescape expansion is likely to result in synergies and trade‐offs between different outcomes, so integrating stakeholder preferences into future scenarios will be important for understanding social acceptance or conflicts and for promoting pathways towards sustainable land use in the future. We used Participatory Scenario Planning to create spatially explicit land use and tree cover scenarios to 2050 in two UK upland landscapes (the North Pennines & Dales in England and the Elenydd in Mid Wales). Stakeholders were asked to list their preferred land use interventions, along with spatial criteria determining their preferred location in the landscape. We then created future scenarios and modelled the impact on greenhouse gas emissions, livestock numbers, timber production, recreation, water run‐off and bird populations. Stakeholder‐led scenarios resulted in an increase in total tree cover from 2.5% to 3.3%–9.7% in the North Pennines & Dales, and from 9.7% to 10.1%–26.8% in the Elenydd. With increasing tree cover, we found positive impacts on greenhouse emissions and water run‐off (both of which declined), woodland birds and nature‐based recreation (both of which increased) and mixed outcomes on timber. On the contrary, increasing tree cover was associated with a reduction in livestock numbers and upland birds. The potential decline of upland bird communities was of particular concern to all stakeholder groups that saw a decline in their scenario. Our methodology provides unique insights into stakeholder‐preferred treescape expansion, which could be expanded to other landscapes and additional interests. Further work should disentangle how future land use scenarios could reduce trade‐offs while still delivering synergies to other ecosystem services. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog

Business · Citizen journalism · Economics · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Participatory planning · Agricultural Economics and Policy · Bioenergy crop production and management · Computer Science · Forest Management and Policy

  • Which biodiversity futures? Towards coherent design choices for scenarios exploring policy‐relevant questions

    Open Access•Anita Lazurko, Sarah Sinclair et al.•People and Nature•2026

  • Place attachment and attitudes to landscape change for tree planting and net zero

    Open Access•Sheena Carlisle, Susan Baker et al.•People and Nature•2026

  • Scenario planning in public policy

    Open Access•Axel Volkery, Teresa Ribeiro•Technological Forecasting and…•2009

  • Landscapes' capacities to provide ecosystem services - A concept for land-cover based assessments

    Open Access•Benjamin Burkhard, Franziska Kroll et al.•Landscape Online•2009

  • Impact of land use change on ecosystem services

    Open Access•Shaikh Shamim Hasan, Lin Zhen et al.•Environmental Development•2020

  • Participatory scenario development for environmental management

    Open Access•Myer S Reed, Jasper O Kenter et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2013

  • Assessing the evidence for stakeholder engagement in biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•Eleanor J Sterling, Erin Betley et al.•Biological Conservation•2017

  • Impacts of woodland planting on nature-based recreational tourism in upland England – A case study

    Open Access•Sara Vangerschov Iversen, Naomi van der Velden et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2023

  • Including stakeholders’ perspectives on ecosystem services in multifunctionality assessments

    Open Access•Lisanne Hölting, Franziska Komossa et al.•Ecosystems and People•2020

  • The costs of delivering environmental outcomes with land sharing and land sparing

    Open Access•Lydia Collas, Romain Crastes Dit Sourd et al.•People and Nature•2023

  • Spatially targeted nature-based solutions can mitigate climate change and nature loss but require a systems approach

    Open Access•Tom Finch, Richard B Bradbury et al.•One Earth•2023

  • Using public participation within land use change scenarios for analysing environmental and socioeconomic drivers

    Open Access•Jessica Penny, Slobodan Djordjević et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2021

  • Meeting tree planting targets on the UK's path to net-zero

    Open Access•Sally Westaway, Ian Grange et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • The natural capital framework for sustainably efficient and equitable decision making

    Open Access•Ian J Bateman, Georgina M Mace•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Best practice for the use of scenarios for restoration planning

    Open Access•Jean Paul Metzger, K J Esler et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2017

  • Sustainable pathways towards climate and biodiversity goals in the UK

    Open Access•Alison Smith, Paula A Harrison et al.•Sustainability Science•2022

  • Participatory multi-stakeholder assessment of alternative development scenarios in contested landscapes

    Open Access•Milena Kiatkoski Kim, Jorge G Álvarez‐Romero et al.•Sustainability Science•2021

  • A framework for participatory scenario planning to guide transitions towards sustainability in mountain social-ecological systems

    Open Access•Tatiana Rodríguez, Björn Reu et al.•Land Use Policy•2023

  • The future of the uplands

    Open Access•Myer S Reed, Aletta Bonn et al.•Land Use Policy•2009

  • Why understanding stakeholder perspectives and emotions is important in upland woodland creation – A case study from Cumbria, UK

    Open Access•Sara Vangerschov Iversen, van der Velden Naomi et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Stakeholders’ perceptions of forestry in rural areas—Two case studies in Ireland

    Open Access•Áine Ní Dhubháin, Marie-Christine Fléchard et al.•Land Use Policy•2009

  • The politics of the rural and relational values

    Open Access•George Holmes, James Clemoes et al.•Geoforum•2022

  • Participatory scenario planning in place-based social-ecological research

    Open Access•Elisa Oteros-Rozas, Berta Martín-López et al.•Conservation Ecology•2015

  • Anticipating and Managing Future Trade-offs and Complementarities between Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•Myer S Reed, Mark S Reed et al.•Conservation Ecology•2013

Citations per year2
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae