Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Knowledge of returning wildlife species and willingness to participate in citizen science projects among wildlife park visitors in Germany

Bibliographic Data

ID19583178
AuthorsEmu Felicitas Ostermann‐Miyashita (0000-0002-5270-5737, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, corresponding author), Hannes König (0000-0002-4980-7388, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research), Nadja Pernat (0000-0003-2244-1002, University of Münster), Sonoko Dorothea Bellingrath‐Kimura (0000-0001-7392-7796, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin), Sophia Hibler (0000-0003-0704-0729, University of Potsdam), Christian Kiffner (0000-0002-7475-9023, Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research)
Year2022
Volume4
Issue5
Pages1201-1215
Publication date2022-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePeople and Nature (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2575-8314 • E-ISSN: 2575-8314
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/pan3.10379
OpenAlexW4283798946
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited123

Successful conservation efforts have led to recent increases of large mammals such as European bison Bison bonasus , moose Alces alces and grey wolf Canis lupus and their return to former habitats in central Europe. While embraced by some, the recovery of these species is a controversial topic and holds potential for human‐wildlife conflicts. Involving the public has been suggested to be an effective method for monitoring wildlife and mitigating associated conflicts. To assess two interrelated prerequisites for engaging people in Citizen Science (CS)—knowledge of returning species and respondents' readiness to participate in CS activities for monitoring and managing these species—we conducted a survey (questionnaire) in two wildlife parks located in different states of Germany. Based on 472 complete questionnaires, we developed generalized linear models to understand how sociodemographic variables and exposure to the species affected visitors' knowledge of each species, and to investigate if sociodemographic variables and knowledge influenced the likelihood of visitors to participate in CS activities. Almost all visitors were aware of the returning wolf population, while knowledge and awareness about bison and moose were significantly lower. Knowledge of the two herbivores differed geographically (higher knowledge of moose in the north‐eastern state), possibly indicating a positive association between exposure to the species and knowledge. However, models generally performed poorly in predicting knowledge about wildlife, suggesting that such specific knowledge is insufficiently explained by sociodemographic variables. Our model, which explained stated willingness in CS indicated that younger participants and those with higher knowledge scores in the survey were more willing to engage in CS activities. Overall, our analyses highlight how exposure to large mammals, knowledge about wildlife and human demographics are interrelated—insights that are helpful for effectively recruiting citizen scientists for wildlife conservation. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog

Biology · Canis · Citizen science · Geography · Habitat · National park · Population · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Wildlife · Animal and Plant Science Education · Demography · Species Distribution and Climate Change · Wildlife Ecology and Conservation · Ecology

  • Knowledge, Attitude, and Willingness to Pay for Malayan Tapir Conservation Among Wildlife Center Visitors in Selangor, Malaysia

    Open Access•Sashikala Manikam, Nitanan Koshy Matthew et al.•SAGE Open•2026

  • Understanding factors that influence people’s perceptions of human disturbance to wildlife using little penguins as a case study

    Open Access•Diane Colombelli‐Négrel, Emily C Costello•Human Dimensions of Wildlife•2024

  • Socio‐ecological correlates of wildlife species identification across rural communities in northern Tanzania

    Open Access•Justin Raycraft, Reilly Becchina et al.•People and Nature•2025

  • Modern Applied Statistics with S

    Open Access•W N Venables, Brian D Ripley•Modern Applied Statistics with S…•2002

  • Does gender make a difference in pro-environmental behavior? The case of the Basque Country University students

    Open Access•M A Vicente-Molina, María-Azucena Vicente-Molina et al.•Journal of Cleaner Production•2018

  • Various Versatile Variances

    Open Access•Achim Zeileis, Susanne Köll et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2020

  • Citizen Science as an Ecological Research Tool

    Janis L Dickinson, Benjamin Zuckerberg et al.•Annual Review of Ecology,…•2010

  • An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human–predator relations

    Open Access•Siân Pooley, Merry Barua et al.•Conservation Biology•2017

  • Linking the influence and dependence of people on biodiversity across scales

    Open Access•Forest Isbell, Andrew Gonzalez et al.•Nature•2017

  • Landscapes that work for biodiversity and people

    Open Access•Claire Kremen, Adina M Merenlender•Science•2018

  • Human–wildlife coexistence in a changing world

    Open Access•Hannes König, Christian Kiffner et al.•Conservation Biology•2020

  • Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas

    Open Access•Carl D Soulsbury, Piran C L White•Wildlife Research•2016

  • Youth-focused citizen science

    Open Access•Heidi L Ballard, Colin Dixon et al.•Biological Conservation•2017

  • Citizen Science

    Rick Bonney, Caren B Cooper et al.•BioScience•2009

  • Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management

    Open Access•Myer S Reed, Mark S Reed et al.•Journal of Environmental Management•2009

  • Transformation of Experience

    Open Access•Susan Clayton, Agathe Colléony et al.•Conservation Letters•2017

  • Environmental knowledge and conservation behavior

    Open Access•Jacqueline Frick, Florian G Kaiser et al.•Personality and Individual…•2004

  • Stakeholder participation for environmental management

    Open Access•Mark S Reed•Biological Conservation•2008

  • A role for Unep’s Regional Seas Programme under the post-2020 global biodiversity framework

    Open Access•Maria Adelaide Ferreira, Christopher R S Barrio Froján et al.•Marine Policy•2022

  • Education, outreach, and inclusive engagement

    Open Access•Benjamin K Haywood, John C Besley•Public Understanding of Science•2014

  • Can citizen science enhance public understanding of science

    Open Access•Rick Bonney, Tina B Phillips et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • The impacts of an invasive species citizen science training program on participant attitudes, behavior, and science literacy

    Open Access•Alycia W Crall, Alycia Crall et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2013

  • Citizen science on a smartphone

    Open Access•Anne M Land‐Zandstra, Anne M Land-Zandstra et al.•Public Understanding of Science•2016

  • Conservation as if People Also Mattered

    Open Access•Philip Camill, Ashish Kothari et al.•Conservation and Society•2013

  • A Survey of Ungulates by Students Along Rural School Bus Routes

    Aaron W E Galloway, Robert Hickey et al.•Society & Natural Resources•2010

  • More than sweat equity

    Open Access•Michael Leyshon, Catherine Leyshon et al.•Journal of Rural Studies•2020

  • Nature-based solutions and their potential to attract the young generations

    Open Access•Chiara Giachino, Giulio Pattanaro et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Using IUCN protected areas management categories as a tool to assess youth preferences for local management of an Important Plant Area (IPA) in Lebanon

    Open Access•M M Salman, Maysaa Salman et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Visitors' values and environmental learning outcomes at wildlife attractions

    Open Access•Roy Ballantyne, Karen Hughes et al.•Tourism Management•2018

  • Building consensus on divisive issues

    Open Access•Susan Todd•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2002

  • The post-normal science of precaution

    Open Access•Jerry Ravetz•Futures•2004

  • Scenario planning during rapid ecological change

    Open Access•Dylan M Beach, Douglas A Clark•Conservation Ecology•2015

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae