Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Transformation of social‐ecological systems in the Songhua River Basin, Northeast China

Lessons for a more sustainable development

Bibliographic Data

ID19583232
AuthorsNa Sa (Minzu University of China), Jinyu Zhao (0000-0002-5871-6234, Minzu University of China), Xuyang Kou (0009-0000-3906-136X, Minzu University of China), Shuanning Zheng (0000-0001-9430-5443, Chinese Academy of Sciences), Zhaohua Lu (0000-0002-3722-0029, China University of Mining and Technology), Jan Christoph Axmacher (0000-0003-1406-928X, University College London), Weiguo Sang (0000-0002-7131-896X, Minzu University of China, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume7
Issue7
Pages1749-1768
Publication date2025-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePeople and Nature (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2575-8314 • E-ISSN: 2575-8314
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/pan3.70086
OpenAlexW4411377448
LanguageEN
References cited91

Social‐ecological systems (SES) are coupled systems formed by the intricate interactions between humans and nature. Our movement towards sustainable lifestyles requires a robust understanding of these interactions. Achieving a sustainable win‐win situation for both social and ecological systems, therefore, necessitates a sound scientific framework outlining the direct and indirect interdependence between a region's inhabitants and the changing natural environment they live in. We developed an archetype‐network framework combining hierarchical clustering, interaction network analysis and catastrophe theory to quantify SES transformations. Analysing 20 indicators across 134 counties in 2000 and 2020, we identified distinct SES archetypes, mapped transition hotspots and assessed inherent sustainability via structural reconfigurations of social‐ecological linkages. This approach captures the nonlinear interactions within SES. Findings indicate five SES archetypes emerging by 2020 that represent a diversification from three types in 2000, with 80 counties shifting archetypes. Key transitions occurred at mountain–plain interfaces: 42.67% of the 2020 agriculture archetype (SES 02) shifted to SES 01 (urban archetype), SES 03 (green development‐archetype) or SES 04 (ethno‐regional fragmented synergy archetype), while 39.58% of nature archetypes transitioned to the enhanced nature archetype (SES 05). Network analysis revealed the dominance of socio‐economic factors. Urban systems (SES 01) showed severe decoupling (network density = 0.14) and the lowest sustainability (0.579), whereas enhanced natural archetypes (SES 05) scored highest (0.787). Sustainability was closely associated with network density ( R 2 = 0.62), indicating that archetypes with tighter linkages tended to be more resilient. Sustainability transitions in the Songhua River Basin require tailored, context‐specific strategies. Urban areas need innovation‐driven recoupling policies while agricultural regions should adopt circular farming practices to reduce ecological risks. In nature‐dominated areas, ecological restoration must be coupled with sustainable economic opportunities that balance conservation and development, while in ethnically diverse regions, cultural preservation should be combined with environment‐focussed governance for sustainable land management. These findings underscore the need for spatially differentiated, policy‐driven solutions to address the complex SES transformation challenges in the Anthropocene. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog

Archaeology · Biology · Cartography · China · Drainage basin · Environmental planning · Environmental resource management · Geography · Geomorphology · Structural basin · Sustainable development · Water resource management · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Environmental Science · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Ecology · Geology

  • Parks and Peoples

    Paige West, Jim Igoe et al.•Annual Review of Anthropology•2006

  • Archetypical patterns and trajectories of land systems in Europe

    Open Access•Christian Levers, Daniel Müller et al.•Regional Environmental Change•2018

  • The 30 m annual land cover dataset and its dynamics in China from 1990 to 2019

    Open Access•Jie Yang, Xin Huang•Earth System Science Data•2021

  • Ecological restoration for sustainable development in China

    Open Access•Bojie Fu, Yanxu Liu et al.•National Science Review•2023

  • Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth

    Open Access•James A Estes, John Terborgh et al.•Science•2011

  • Approaches and terminology for causal analysis in land systems science

    Open Access•Patrick Meyfroidt•Journal of Land Use Science•2016

  • Ageing threatens sustainability of smallholder farming in China

    Open Access•Chenchen Ren, Xinyue Zhou et al.•Nature•2023

  • Social–ecological network analysis of scale mismatches in estuary watershed restoration

    Open Access•Jesse Sayles, Jesse S Sayles et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2017

  • How Social Considerations Improve the Equity and Effectiveness of Ecosystem Restoration

    Open Access•Sara Löfqvist, Fritz Kleinschroth et al.•BioScience•2023

  • Locally Based, Regionally Manifested, and Globally Relevant

    Open Access•E S Brondizio, Yildiz Aumeeruddy‐thoma et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2021

  • Toward Principles for Enhancing the Resilience of Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•Reinette Biggs, Maja Schlüter et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2012

  • Social-Ecological Systems Insights for Navigating the Dynamics of the Anthropocene

    Open Access•Belinda Reyers, Carl Folke et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2018

  • A General Framework for Analyzing Sustainability of Social-Ecological Systems

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Science•2009

  • Ice-and-snow tourism in China

    Open Access•Jianping Yang, Yanxia Wang et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • Mapping fine-resolution nested social-ecological system archetypes to reveal archetypical human-environmental interactions

    Open Access•Yuanyuan Yang, Wenkai Bao et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2023

  • Integrating inductive and deductive analysis to identify and characterize archetypical social-ecological systems and their changes

    Open Access•Manuel Pacheco-Romero, Manuel Pacheco‐Romero et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2021

  • Assessing the dynamics of sustainability for social-ecological systems based on the adaptive cycle framework

    Open Access•Ling Zhang, Zhang Ling et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2021

  • A meta‐analysis of SES framework case studies

    Open Access•Stefan Partelow, Sergio Villamayor-Toma et al.•People and Nature•2024

  • Linking network ecology and ecosystem services to benefit people

    Open Access•Anna Stanworth, Kelvin S-H Peh et al.•People and Nature•2024

  • Studying human–nature relationships through a network lens

    Open Access•Lotta Clara Kluger, Philipp Gorris et al.•People and Nature•2020

  • A review of the social-ecological systems framework

    Open Access•Stefan Partelow•Conservation Ecology•2018

  • Achieving the promise of integration in social-ecological research

    Open Access•Angela M Guererro, Angela M Guerrero et al.•Conservation Ecology•2018

  • A data-driven methodological routine to identify key indicators for social-ecological system archetype mapping

    Open Access•Manuel Pacheco‐Romero, María Vallejos et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2022

  • A succinct review and analysis of drivers and impacts of agricultural land transformations in Asia

    Open Access•Sivapuram Venkata Rama Krishna Prabhakar•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Advancing sustainability through mainstreaming a social–ecological systems perspective

    Open Access•Joern Fischer, Toby Gardner et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2015

  • A framework for assessing coupling and de-coupling trajectories in river social-ecological systems

    Open Access•Cristina Quintas‐soriano, Joan Brandt et al.•Sustainability Science•2021

  • Why is it necessary to integrate circular economy practices for agri‐food sustainability from a global perspective

    Open Access•M Zakiul Islam, Lili Zheng•Sustainable Development•2024

  • Social‐ecological systems approach for adaptation to climate change

    Open Access•Md Sarwar Hossain, Sayantani M Basak et al.•Sustainable Development•2023

  • The social–ecological system framework as a knowledge classificatory system for benthic small-scale fisheries

    Open Access•Xavier Basurto, Stefan Gelcich et al.•Global Environmental Change•2013

  • The role of social networks in natural resource governance

    Open Access•Örjan Bodin, Beatrice Crona et al.•Global Environmental Change•2009

  • The impact of the EU Emissions Trading System on low-carbon technological change

    Open Access•Jordi Teixidó-Figueras, Jordi Teixidó et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • SDG interlinkage networks

    Open Access•Jonathan Dawes, J H P Dawes•World Development•2021

  • Mechanism of regional land use transition in underdeveloped areas of China

    Open Access•Junfeng Tian, Binyan Wang et al.•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Rural typology dynamics and drivers in peripheral areas

    Open Access•Jingning Liu, Jianzhi Liu et al.•Land Use Policy•2022

  • Assessing the impact of emissions trading scheme on low-carbon technological innovation

    Open Access•Zhonglu Liu, Haibo Sun•Environmental Impact Assessment…•2021

  • Tipping Toward Sustainability

    Open Access•Frances Westley, Per Olsson et al.•AMBIO•2011

  • Dehesas as high nature value farming systems

    Open Access•Tobias Plieninger, Lukas Flinzberger et al.•Conservation Ecology•2021

  • Collective payments for ecosystem services

    Open Access•Josef Kaiser, Dwight Haase et al.•Conservation Ecology•2023

  • The social structural foundations of adaptation and transformation in social-ecological systems

    Open Access•M Louise Barnes, Örjan Bodin et al.•Conservation Ecology•2017

  • Archetype analysis in sustainability research

    Open Access•Diana Sietz, Ulrich Frey et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • Capturing emergent phenomena in social-ecological systems

    Open Access•Maja Schlüter, L Jamila Haider et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • Archetype analysis in sustainability research

    Open Access•Christoph Oberlack, Diana Sietz et al.•Conservation Ecology•2019

  • Social-ecological resilience and biosphere-based sustainability science

    Open Access•Carl Folke, Reinette Biggs et al.•Conservation Ecology•2016

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae