Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Linking cultural ecosystem services with individual and collective wellbeing in recreational urban blue spaces

Insights from Danang, Vietnam

Bibliographic Data

ID19585486
AuthorsLam Thi Mai Huynh (0000-0002-2801-8240, Institute for Future Engineering, corresponding author), Hiroe Ishihara (0000-0002-6977-0412, The University of Tokyo), Xuan Truong Trinh (0000-0003-1513-3546, Yamaguchi University), Kensuke Fukushi (Institute for Future Engineering), Alexandros Gasparatos (0000-0001-9323-1366, Institute for Future Engineering)
Year2025
Volume21
Issue1
Publication date2025-12-31
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueEcosystems and People (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2639-5908 • E-ISSN: 2639-5916
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/26395916.2025.2588087
OpenAlexW4417233115
LanguageEN
References cited65

Urban green and blue spaces contribute many non-material benefits to human wellbeing. However, there are many gaps at this interface including (a) unclear conceptualisation of the mechanisms mediating the linkages between the non-material benefits of Nature and human wellbeing, (b) disproportionate focus of studies on individual wellbeing than collective wellbeing, (c) lack of understanding of possible synergies and trade-offs between individual and collective wellbeing. Here, we aim to unravel the linkages between the non-material benefits of Nature with individual and collective wellbeing. We focus on recreational cultural ecosystem services (CES) from urban blue spaces in a rapidly transforming tourism-dependent coastal city in Vietnam. We elicit these linkages through in-depth interviews and deliberative focus group discussions (FGDs) with the local community, and systematise the linkages through causal loop diagrams. We find that recreational CES from blue spaces contribute to eight constituents of individual wellbeing, namely physical health, mental health, subjective well-being, spirituality, personal identity and autonomy, learning and capability, connectedness and belonging, and economic wellbeing. Recreational CES also contribute to five constituents of collective wellbeing, namely open communication, collective actions, communion, tolerance and distributive justice. We identify 12 mechanisms mediating these linkages, with the most important ones being regenerative, cognitive, cohesive, collaborative and destructive mechanisms. We also observe that recreational CES create synergies and trade-offs between different constituents of wellbeing. We particularly note trade-offs and synergies among constituents of individual and collective wellbeing such as trade-offs between economic wellbeing (constituent of individual wellbeing) and distributive justice (constituent of collective wellbeing), among others

Collective identity · Ecosystem services · Focus group · Recreation · Social connectedness · Sustainability · Art Therapy and Mental Health · Place Attachment and Urban Studies · Urban Green Space and Health

  • Urban Gardens as Multifunctional Nature-Based Solutions for Societal Goals in a Changing Climate

    Open Access•Inês Cabral, Inês Amendoeira Cabral et al.•Nature-Based Solutions to Climate…•2017

  • Revision of the Common International Classification for Ecosystem Services (Cices V5.1)

    Open Access•Roy Haines-Young, Roy Haines‐young et al.•One Ecosystem•2018

  • Nature's contributions in coping with a pandemic in the 21st century

    Open Access•S M Labib, Matthew H E M Browning et al.•The Science of The Total…•2022

  • Ecosystem services and the idea of shared values

    Open Access•Katherine N Irvine, Liz O’brien et al.•Ecosystem Services•2016

  • Cultural ecosystem services as a gateway for improving urban sustainability

    Open Access•Erik Andersson, Maria Tengö et al.•Ecosystem Services•2015

  • Promoting ecosystem and human health in urban areas using Green Infrastructure

    Open Access•Konstantinos Tzoulas, Kalevi Korpela et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2007

  • Humans and Nature

    Open Access•Roly Russell, Anne D Guerry et al.•Annual Review of Environment and…•2013

  • Subjective well-being indicators for large-scale assessment of cultural ecosystem services

    Open Access•Rosalind Bryce, Katherine N Irvine et al.•Ecosystem Services•2016

  • The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used

    Open Access•Åsa Ode Sang, Igor Knez et al.•Urban Forestry & Urban Greening•2016

  • Being Well Together

    Open Access•Stephen Atkinson, Anne-Marie Bagnall et al.•Journal of Happiness Studies•2020

  • Stakeholder participation for environmental management

    Open Access•Mark S Reed•Biological Conservation•2008

  • Handbook of Research Design & Social Measurement

    Delbert C Miller, Delbert Miller et al.•Handbook of Research Design &…•2002

  • The use of focus groups in cultural ecosystem services research

    Open Access•Ľuboš Slovák, Jan Daněk et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • A systematic review of cultural ecosystem services of blue carbon ecosystems

    Open Access•Jay Mar D Quevedo, Ryo Kohsaka•Marine Policy•2024

  • Saturation in qualitative research

    Open Access•Benjamin Saunders, Joe Sims et al.•Quality & Quantity•2017

  • Nature interactions and their associations with connection to nature and well‐being varies between different types of green spaces

    Open Access•Whitney Fleming, Assaf Shwartz•People and Nature•2023

  • How to Conduct a Deductive Content Analysis in Counseling Research

    William Bradley McKibben, Rochelle Cade et al.•Counseling Outcome Research and…•2020

  • Cascades of green

    Open Access•Ebba Brink, Johannes Theodor Aalders et al.•Global Environmental Change•2016

  • Comparing instrumental and deliberative paradigms underpinning the assessment of social values for cultural ecosystem services

    Open Access•Christopher M Raymond, Jasper O Kenter et al.•Ecological Economics•2014

  • Discourse-based valuation of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Matthew A Wilson, Richard B Howarth•Ecological Economics•2002

  • Stewardship, care and relational values

    Open Access•West, L Jamila Haider et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2018

  • A social assessment of urban parkland

    Open Access•Lindsay K Campbell, Erika S Svendsen et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2016

  • The importance of social learning for non-market valuation

    Open Access•Daniel Grainger, Natalie Stoeckl•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Is It Really Just a Social Construction

    Richard C Stedman•Society & Natural Resources•2003

  • Conflict in tourism development in rural China

    Open Access•Liguo Wang, Yukio Yotsumoto•Tourism Management•2019

  • Exploring well-being as a tourism product resource

    Open Access•Sarah Pyke, Heather Hartwell et al.•Tourism Management•2016

  • Cities, Social Cohesion and the Environment

    Open Access•Ian R Cook, E Swyngedouw•Urban Studies•2012

  • Social-Ecological Transformation for Ecosystem Management

    Open Access•Per Olsson, Carl Folke et al.•Conservation Ecology•2004

  • The Erosion of Public Space and the Public Realm

    Open Access•Setha M Low•City & Society•2006

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae