Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Capturing landscape values in peri-urban Satoyama forests

Diversity of visitors' perceptions and implications for future value assessments

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19586152
AutoresBarbara Kovács (0000-0002-0196-7163, Instituto Politécnico Nacional), Yuta Uchiyama (0000-0001-7363-896X, Kobe University), Y Miyake (0000-0003-3246-243X, The University of Tokyo), Jay Mar D Quevedo (0000-0003-1940-4462, The University of Tokyo), Ryo Kohsaka (0000-0001-6822-4340, The University of Tokyo, autor de correspondencia)
Año2022
Volumen10
Páginas100339
Fecha de publicación2022-12-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaTrees Forests and People (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2666-7193 • E-ISSN: 2666-7193
EditorialElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100339
OpenAlexW4298008010
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas71

Peri-urban Satoyama forests in Japan provide multiple or bundles of cultural ecosystem services (CES), yet, visitors’ perceptions of CES are not well established. There is a need to explore these perceptions in order to provide comprehensive information to forest managers. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by exploring the profiles of visitors of peri-urban Satoyama forests and their perceived importance of CES using a landscape value (LV) typology table. Nine LVs of Kaisho Forest in Aichi, Japan were assessed using face-to-face questionnaires on socio-demographic variables, forest use, and a photograph-based approach, which were analyzed using descriptive statistics, quantitative cross-tabulation, multiple response analyses, and geocoding. Results showed that the forest is visited mostly by married elderly people from Aichi Prefecture who were engaged in forest bathing or birdwatching. Forest use patterns, like frequency, duration of the visit, and group size, presented a significant relation to demographic variables, like marital status or gender. Furthermore, the study showed how visitors ́ LV perceptions were weighted towards natural and aesthetic values. The socio-cultural Satoyama forest elements displayed a more detailed value perception where recreational, therapeutic, spiritual, cultural-historic, and educational values were also assigned. The LV perception enhances a comprehensive description of the perceived positive effects of visiting such forests. Hence, we concluded that visitors gain positive effects on mental and emotional health and spirituality as part of CES. Forest managers can reflect and accommodate diverse landscape value typology as a tool for monitoring visitors’ perceptions

Environmental resource management · Forest management · Geography · Marital status · Perception · Population · Recreation · Socioeconomics · Sociology · Typology · Demography · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Psychology · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Urban Green Space and Health · Ecology · Forestry

  • How nature and landscape quality connect

    Open Access•Gonzalo De La Fuente De Val•Forest Policy and Economics•2025

  • Enhancing land planning

    Open Access•Santiago Madrigal-Martínez, Eric Gielen et al.•Cities•2025

  • Trade-offs, synergies and driving pathways between tourism cultural ecosystem service and multiple ecosystem services in ecological functional zone

    Open Access•Li Li, Rundong Feng et al.•Habitat International•2025

  • Twenty years of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Alexey Voinov, R S De Groot et al.•Ecosystem Services•2017

  • Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda

    Open Access•Terry C Daniel, Andreas Muhar et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2012

  • Perception of rural landscapes in Flanders

    Open Access•Elke Rogge, Frank Nevens et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2007

  • The physiological effects of Shinrin-yoku (taking in the forest atmosphere or forest bathing)

    Open Access•Bum Jin Park, Yuko Tsunetsugu et al.•Environmental Health and…•2010

  • A socio-ecological exploration of fear of crime in urban green spaces – A systematic review

    Maruthaveeran Sreetheran, Cecil C Konijnendijk van den Bosch•Urban Forestry & Urban Greening•2014

  • Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision making

    Open Access•R S De Groot, Rob Alkemade et al.•Ecological Complexity•2010

  • Evaluation of cultural ecosystem services

    Open Access•Xin Cheng, Sylvie Van Damme et al.•Ecosystem Services•2019

  • Cultural ecosystem services provided by landscapes

    Open Access•Anna Tengberg, Susanne Fredholm et al.•Ecosystem Services•2012

  • Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century

    Open Access•Terry C Daniel•Landscape and Urban Planning•2001

  • Contact with blue-green spaces during the Covid-19 pandemic lockdown beneficial for mental health

    Open Access•Sarai Pouso, Ángel Borja et al.•The Science of The Total…•2021

  • A GIS application for assessing, mapping, and quantifying the social values of ecosystem services

    Open Access•Benson C Sherrouse, Jessica Clement et al.•Applied Geography•2011

  • The role of social values in the management of ecological systems

    Open Access•Christopher D Ives, Dave Kendal•Journal of Environmental Management•2014

  • Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services

    Open Access•R Fish, Andrew Church et al.•Ecosystem Services•2016

  • User-Generated Geographic Information for Visitor Monitoring in a National Park

    Open Access•Vuokko Heikinheimo, Enrico Di Minin et al.•ISPRS International Journal of…•2017

  • Aesthetic and spiritual values of ecosystems

    Open Access•Nigel Cooper, Erika Brady et al.•Ecosystem Services•2016

  • Social–ecological hotspots mapping

    Open Access•Lilian Alessa, Andrew Kliskey et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2008

  • Science for managing ecosystem services

    Open Access•R Carpenter, Stephen R Carpenter et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2009

  • Using social media photos to explore the relation between cultural ecosystem services and landscape features across five European sites

    Open Access•Elisa Oteros-Rozas, Berta Martín-López et al.•Ecological Indicators•2018

  • The effects of naturalness, gender, and age on how urban green space is perceived and used

    Open Access•Åsa Ode Sang, Igor Knez et al.•Urban Forestry & Urban Greening•2016

  • Effect of forest bathing trips on human immune function

    Open Access•Qing Li•Environmental Health and…•2010

  • Comparing landscape value patterns between participatory mapping and geolocated social media content across Europe

    Open Access•Anton Stahl Olafsson, Ross S Purves et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2022

  • High public appreciation for the cultural ecosystem services of urban and peri‐urban forests during the Covid-19 pandemic

    Open Access•Angela Beckmann-Wübbelt, Annika Fricke et al.•Sustainable Cities and Society•2021

  • Analysis of cultural ecosystem services of rock climbing settings in Mexico City

    Open Access•Barbara Kovács, Marco Antonio Marquez-Linares et al.•Ecosystems and People•2021

  • Geography of disservices in urban forests

    Open Access•Christoph F Baumeister, Tina Gerstenberg et al.•Ecosystems and People•2022

  • Quantifying cultural ecosystem services

    Open Access•Eleanor R Tew, Benno I Simmons et al.•People and Nature•2019

  • Cultural Ecosystem Services

    Open Access•Andra-Ioana Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana Milcu et al.•Conservation Ecology•2013

  • Integrating socio-cultural perspectives into ecosystem service valuation

    Open Access•Samantha S K Scholte, Samantha Scholte et al.•Ecological Economics•2015

  • The role of cultural ecosystem services in landscape management and planning

    Open Access•Tobias Plieninger, Claudia Bieling et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2015

  • Mapping and characterizing ecosystem services of social–ecological production landscapes

    Open Access•Shizuka Hashimoto, Shogo Nakamura et al.•Sustainability Science•2014

  • Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services

    Open Access•Stephen Farber, Stephen C Farber et al.•Ecological Economics•2002

  • Navigating conflicting landscape aspirations

    Open Access•Andra-Ioana Horcea-Milcu, Andra Ioana Milcu et al.•Land Use Policy•2014

  • Coproduction of ecosystem services as human–nature interactions—An analytical framework

    Open Access•A Fischer, Austin Eastwood et al.•Land Use Policy•2016

  • Mapping the intangible

    Open Access•Johannes Langemeyer, Fulvia Calcagni et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Using photography to elicit grazier values and management practices relating to tree survival and recruitment

    Open Access•Kate Sherren, Joern Fischer et al.•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Social needs of the elderly and active aging in public open spaces in urban renewal

    Open Access•Esther H K Yung, Sheila Conejos et al.•Cities•2016

  • Community perceptions of long-term mangrove cover changes and its drivers from a typhoon-prone province in the Philippines

    Open Access•Jay Mar D Quevedo, Yuta Uchiyama et al.•AMBIO•2022

  • The farmer as a landscape steward

    Open Access•Christopher M Raymond, Claudia Bieling et al.•AMBIO•2016

  • Nature at Aichi World's Expo 2005

    Fred Nadis•Technology and Culture•2007

  • Not too small to benefit society

    Open Access•U Schirpke, Rocco Scolozzi et al.•Conservation Ecology•2022

  • The Cultural Values Model

    Open Access•Jessica Stephenson, Janet Stephenson•Landscape and Urban Planning•2007

  • From Timber to Tourism

    Open Access•John Knight•Development and Change•2000

  • Representaciones sociales y experiencias de vida cotidiana de los ancianos en la Ciudad de México

    Open Access•Martha De Alba González•Estudios Demográficos y Urbanos•2017

Obras citantes distintas3
Citas por año3
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2025 (1)
Velocidad de citaciónrecent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae