Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How does biodiversity monitoring impact those who conduct it? Reported outcomes and perspectives of a field team in Lore Lindu National Park, Indonesia

Bibliographic Data

ID19586244
AuthorsMary Mulligan (0009-0006-6720-2856, IPB University, corresponding author), H Faust (0000-0003-0307-6943, University of Göttingen), Lutz Fehrmann (0000-0002-7560-2597, University of Göttingen), Fabian Brambach (0000-0002-3203-2248, University of Göttingen), Cesar Andi Mappatoba (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry), Kamaluddin Kamaluddin (Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry), Adam Malik (0000-0003-4121-3259, Tadulako University), Tatang Tiryana (0000-0002-8430-7311, IPB University), I Nengah Surati Jaya (0000-0002-3868-7595, IPB University), Christoph Kleinn (0000-0002-8625-3492, University of Göttingen)
Year2026
Volume24
Pages101166
Publication date2026-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTrees Forests and People (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2666-7193 • E-ISSN: 2666-7193
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.tfp.2026.101166
OpenAlexW7124951613
LanguageEN
References cited45

Biodiversity monitoring enhances our understanding of the natural environment, provides insights into ecological trends, and evaluates the effectiveness of conservation and management efforts. However, less is known about how such monitoring affects those who conduct it, both in terms of personal benefits and potential shifts in their environmental perspectives. To explore these impacts, we (the project consortium) interviewed the 44 individuals who participated in a biodiversity monitoring campaign from February 2023 to February 2024 in Lore Lindu National Park, Indonesia. All respondents reported enhanced knowledge and professional networks, while the vast majority also highlighted increased income generation (97%), capacity development (92%), and personal fulfillment (97%). Most respondents reported increased awareness, motivation, and knowledge related to the national park and its preservation, with 43% of responses classified as a genuine perspective shift. Participants from the local communities in particular described a heightened sense of pride and responsibility towards protecting the park’s natural resources. More broadly, 80% of respondents expressed a positive perspective shift towards nature and the environment as a whole. These findings align with participant outcomes observed in both citizen science and other collaborative monitoring contexts, suggesting that, beyond scientific and management benefits, biodiversity monitoring campaigns also provide meaningful social, economic, and educational benefits. These additional outcomes support both conservation and local development and should be considered when planning future monitoring campaigns

Biodiversity · Biodiversity conservation · Citizen science · National park · Natural resource · Perspective (graphical) · Pride · Sustainability · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Conservation, Ecology, Wildlife Education · Species Distribution and Climate Change

  • Analyzing and Interpreting Data From Likert-Type Scales

    Gail M Sullivan, Anthony R Artino•Journal of Graduate Medical…•2013

  • Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity

    Open Access•Bradley J Cardinale, J Emmett Duffy et al.•Nature•2012

  • A Framework for Articulating and Measuring Individual Learning Outcomes from Participation in Citizen Science

    Open Access•Tina Phillips, Tina B Phillips et al.•Citizen Science: Theory and…•2018

  • Using perceptions as evidence to improve conservation and environmental management

    Open Access•Nathan J Bennett•Conservation Biology•2016

  • Local Participation in Natural Resource Monitoring

    Open Access•Finn Danielsen, Neil D Burge et al.•Conservation Biology•2009

  • Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities

    Open Access•Norman Myers, Russell A Mittermeier et al.•Nature•2000

  • Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys

    Open Access•Ivar Krumpal•Quality & Quantity•2013

  • Biodiversity citizen science

    Open Access•Maria Peter, Tim Diekötter et al.•People and Nature•2021

  • A Reflection on the Fair Use of Unpaid Work in Conservation

    Open Access•Ans Vercammen, Caroline Park et al.•Conservation and Society•2020

  • Monitoring biodiversity change through effective global coordination

    Open Access•Laetitia M Navarro, Néstor Fernández et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2017

  • Technological advances in biodiversity monitoring

    Open Access•P J Stephenson•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2020

  • Bridging local and scientific knowledge for area-based conservation of useful plants in Colombia

    Open Access•Laura Kor, Mateo Fernández-Lucero et al.•AMBIO•2024

  • Increasing Conservation Management Action by Involving Local People in Natural Resource Monitoring

    Finn Danielsen, Marlynn M Mendoza et al.•AMBIO•2007

  • Improving attitudes and knowledge in a citizen science project about urban bat ecology

    Open Access•Hannah Greving, Till Bruckermann et al.•Conservation Ecology•2022

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae