The canopy and the community
Quantifying the disparity of urban forest benefits and vulnerability in Maryland
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19586348 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ian Kalama (0009-0002-4290-4377, University of Maryland Eastern Shore, corresponding author), Stephanie Stotts (0009-0002-6542-5571, University of Maryland Eastern Shore) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 24 |
| Pages | 101182 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Trees Forests and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2666-7193 • E-ISSN: 2666-7193 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tfp.2026.101182 |
| OpenAlex | W7128372798 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Urban forests deliver essential ecosystem services, such as carbon storage, air-pollution removal, and stormwater regulation, that support environmental quality and public health. Yet these benefits are unevenly distributed, exacerbating inequities between high- and low-vulnerability communities. The primary goal of this study was twofold: (1) to quantify the tract-level distribution of key urban forest ecosystem services (ES) across Maryland's 34 urban areas, and (2) to statistically evaluate the extent to which their provision is tied to social vulnerability. Using GIS-based spatial analysis, i-Tree Landscape estimates, and 2020 U.S. Census tract boundaries, we mapped tree canopy cover, carbon storage and sequestration, air-pollution removal, transpiration, rainfall interception, and avoided runoff (volume and value). Social vulnerability classifications were derived from Social Vulnerability Index (SVI) metrics based on U.S. Census Bureau’s Community Resilience Estimates (CRE). Disparities were quantified using Kruskal–Wallis and Tukey’s post-hoc tests to compare ES provision across three CRE vulnerability classes. Results indicate that low-vulnerability communities consistently exhibit higher tree canopy cover and greater ecosystem service benefits, while highly vulnerable communities experience reduced canopy cover and diminished access to these services. Significant associations between SVI metrics and ES distribution highlight persistent socio-environmental disparities in urban forestry. These findings demonstrate unequal distribution of ecosystem service provision, with the most vulnerable communities receiving the fewest benefits. This tract-level framework provides a replicable and scalable tool for assessing equity in urban forest benefits, supporting prioritization of urban greening investments, equitable strategies, and policy interventions aimed at promoting more inclusive resilient urban landscapes and restoring ecosystem benefits
Canopy · Urban area · Urban forest · Urban Forestry · Vegetation (pathology) · Vulnerability (computing) · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability · Urban Green Space and Health · Urban Heat Island Mitigation
Residential housing segregation and urban tree canopy in 37 US Cities
Trees Grow on Money
Health Benefits from Nature Experiences Depend on Dose
The significance of parks to physical activity and public health
Social and Spatial Inequities in Exposure to Flood Risk in Miami, Florida
Tree and forest effects on air quality and human health in the United States
Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States
Carbon storage and sequestration by trees in urban and community areas of the United States
Who has access to urban vegetation? A spatial analysis of distributional green equity in 10 US cities
Green spaces and cognitive development in primary schoolchildren
The spatial allocation of population
Carbon storage and sequestration by urban trees in the USA
Urban Trees and Human Health
The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital
Green Apartheid
Urban tree canopy has greater cooling effects in socially vulnerable communities in the US
The potential of urban trees to reduce heat-related mortality in London
Exposure to Flood Hazards in Miami and Houston
Ecosystem services in urban areas
Reassessing racial and socioeconomic disparities in environmental justice research
The Political Ecology of Uneven Urban Green Space
Social Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards
| Highly cited | No |
|---|