Brazil’s legal and policy framework for combating Amazon deforestation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19586992 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Min Zhang (0000-0003-4273-6836, Nanjing Agricultural University, corresponding author), Zhang Min (0000-0002-7714-1413), Dong Yulu (Nanjing Agricultural University), Liu Xiaolu (Nanjing Agricultural University), Donny De Castro (0000-0003-1995-005X, Lanzhou University), Douglas De Castro |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 22 |
| Pages | 101065 |
| Publication date | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Trees Forests and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2666-7193 • E-ISSN: 2666-7193 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tfp.2025.101065 |
| OpenAlex | W4415535500 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 53 |
Systematically evaluates Brazil’s legal and policy frameworks for combating Amazon deforestation. • Identifies key flaws in the current governance framework in Brazil. • Provides recommendations to strengthen legal and policy measures to combat deforestation As Brazil hosts over 60% of the Amazon forest, its domestic legal and policy frameworks significantly influence the governance of the region. This study systematically examines Brazil's federal legal and policy systems aimed at combating Amazon deforestation, encompassing constitutional provisions, environmental laws, forest legislation, and key policies such as the Amazon Region Protected Areas Program (ARPA) and the Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Deforestation in the Legal Amazon (PPCDAm). Analyzed through the lenses of environmental philosophy, property rights jurisprudence, and polycentric governance theory, the study identifies critical flaws in the current governance framework: an anthropocentric value orientation, leniency toward illegal deforestation, long-standing land tenure insecurity, high policy volatility, and institutional conflicts among governance agencies. Based on these findings, the article proposes recommendations to enhance Brazil’s deforestation-combating efforts, including transcending anthropocentric stance, intensifying anti-deforestation laws and policies, improving land tenure governance, and constructing a polycentric governance system that integrates domestic and international actors. These measures aim to balance ecological protection and sustainable development in the Amazon region
Action plan · Amazon rainforest · Anthropocentrism · Corporate governance · Environmental governance · Property rights · Sustainable development · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system
Beyond Markets and States
Rethinking polycentricity
Whose forest? A two-level collective action perspective on struggles to reach polycentric governance
Stimulus for land grabbing and deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Unmasking the impunity of illegal deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Quantifying timber illegality risk in the Brazilian forest frontier
Forest conservation in Indigenous territories and protected areas in the Brazilian Amazon
The Escazú Agreement Contribution to Environmental Justice in Latin America
Land-grabbing mafias and dispossession in the Brazilian Amazon
Law enforcement and deforestation
Deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon
Regulatory politics and hybrid governance
Forest Trade on the Amazon Frontier and Its Interaction with the Eudr
Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice
Transnational partnerships, domestic institutions, and sustainable development. The case of Brazil and the Amazon Region Protected Areas program
Rural Environmental Registry
Brazil’s conservation reform and the reduction of deforestation in Amazonia
Viewpoint
Land grabbing in the Brazilian Amazon
Property rights and violence in indigenous land in Brazil
State-led social and environmental policy failure in a Brazilian forest frontier
Lawless land in no man’s land
Parks under attack
M aking the “C itizen C onstitution ”
Land Struggle in Brazil Under the Workers' Party Governments
Policy dismantling and democratic regression in Brazil under Bolsonaro
Management of the Tapajós-Arapiuns Extractive Reserve
A revisão do Código Florestal brasileiro
Before Biodiversity
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |