Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Farmers’ preferences for adopting agroforestry in the Eastern Province of Rwanda

A choice experiment

Bibliographic Data

ID19587154
AuthorsJean Bosco Nkurikiye (0000-0003-3229-6486, KU Leuven, corresponding author), Valens Uwizeyimana (0000-0003-0120-9837, KU Leuven), Kato Van Ruymbeke (0000-0003-2453-2143, KU Leuven), Iris Vanermen (0000-0003-0077-8931, KU Leuven), Bruno Verbist (0000-0001-5169-7176, KU Leuven), Alfred R Bizoza (0000-0002-1180-9169, University of Rwanda), Liesbet Vranken (0000-0003-1170-1139, KU Leuven)
Year2024
Volume16
Pages100592
Publication date2024-06-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTrees Forests and People (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2666-7193 • E-ISSN: 2666-7193
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100592
OpenAlexW4399040180
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited57

Agroforestry is recognized as an effective land restoration strategy in Rwanda. To effectively implement agroforestry practices, it is crucial to examine and address the preferences of farmers. However, there is limited knowledge concerning farmers’ preferences for different agroforestry characteristics and their level of willingness to engage in such systems. This paper examines farmers’ preferences for adopting agroforestry in the Eastern Province of Rwanda using a discrete choice experiment (DCE) conducted among 248 households. The analysis conducted at plot level included a total of eight attributes: number of fruit trees, number of non-fruit trees, root system and canopy, change in maize yield resulting from tree planting, extension assistance, additional labor, distance to the tree nursery, and the cost of tree seedlings. Results indicate that farmers are generally willing to adopt agroforestry practices. They prefer agroforestry systems that incorporate non-fruit and particularly fruit trees, trees with smaller canopies, agroforestry systems with potential to increase maize yields, and regular extension assistance. However, farmers dislike increases in the cost of tree seedlings. Furthermore, findings reveal two distinct latent classes of plots, encompassing 34.5% (class 1) and 65.5% (class 2) of the plots. Farmers in Class 1 possess plots that are farther away from their homesteads and are indifferent towards the number of trees to be planted but prefer trees that increase maize yields. Farmers in Class 2 exhibit a strong inclination towards planting a greater number of trees that increase maize yields and have a small canopy. The proximity to tree nurseries and the availability of low-cost tree seedlings contribute to the likelihood of tree planting in this class. This study recommends aligning agroforestry-related policies and interventions with the preferences and needs of the farmers, taking into account plot characteristics

Agroforestry · Agronomy · Biology · Canopy · Geography · Sowing · Tree planting · Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Mathematics · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability

  • More-than-human farming

    Open Access•Caroline Wamala-Larsson, Linley Chiwona‐karltun et al.•Gender & Development•2026

  • Does increased tree cover in eastern Rwanda result in higher woody biomass availability for energy consumption

    Open Access•Valens Uwizeyimana, Jean Bosco Nkurikiye et al.•Trees Forests and People•2025

  • Understanding farmers' attitudes and aspirations for tree-cover restoration in the Kilombero Valley, Tanzania

    Open Access•Eleanor Durrant, Peter Howson et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2025

  • Technology adoption, impact, and extension in developing countries’ agriculture

    Open Access•Kazushi Takahashi, Rie Muraoka et al.•Agricultural Economics•2020

  • Vaccine eagerness

    Open Access•Sandra Chyderiotis, Jonathan Sicsic et al.•SSM - Population Health•2022

  • Agroforestry adoption as a systems concept

    Open Access•Dagninet Amare, Dietrich Darr•Forest Policy and Economics•2020

  • The willingness to offset CO2 emissions from traveling

    Open Access•Claudia Schwirplies, Elisabeth Dütschke et al.•Ecological Economics•2019

  • Land Degradation and Challenges of Food Security

    Open Access•Gauri Shankar Gupta•Review of European Studies•2019

  • Achieving mitigation and adaptation to climate change through sustainable agroforestry practices in Africa

    Open Access•Cheikh Mbow, Pete Smith et al.•Current Opinion in Environmental…•2013

  • Preference and WTP stability for public forest management

    Open Access•Mikolaj Czajkowski, Anna Bartczak et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2016

  • Tenure regimes and remoteness

    Open Access•Karin Begazo Curie, Karl Mertens et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2021

  • Using a choice experiment approach to assess production tradeoffs for developing the croton value chain in Kenya

    Open Access•Michael Jacobson, Yau-Huo Shr et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2017

  • Providing preference-based support for forest ecosystem service management

    Mikolaj Czajkowski, Anna Bartczak et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2013

  • Can a sequential analysis provide a more robust understanding of farmers' adoption decisions? An example from an agroforestry adoption study in Ethiopia

    Open Access•Dagninet Amare, Dietrich Darr•Forest Policy and Economics•2023

  • Are non-market values important to smallholders' afforestation decisions? A psychometric segmentation and its implications for afforestation programs

    Open Access•Kahlil Baker, Kathy Baylis et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2018

  • Emergency and Development

    D Hilhorst•Journal of Refugee Studies•2000

  • Who is resilient in Africa’s Green Revolution? Sustainable intensification and Climate Smart Agriculture in Rwanda

    Open Access•Nathan Clay, K S Zimmerer•Land Use Policy•2020

  • Agroforestry creates carbon sinks whilst enhancing the environment in agricultural landscapes in Europe

    Open Access•Sonja Kay, Carlo Rega et al.•Land Use Policy•2019

  • Eliciting farmers’ preferences and willingness to pay for land use attributes in Northwest Ethiopia

    Open Access•Wubante Fetene Admasu, Steven Van Passel et al.•Land Use Policy•2021

  • Agricultural innovation from above and from below

    J Van Damme, An Ansoms et al.•African Affairs•2014

  • Large-Scale Land Deals and Local Livelihoods in Rwanda

    Open Access•An Ansoms•African Studies Review•2013

Citations per year3
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae