Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Exploring the socioeconomic drivers of deforestation in Bangladesh

The case of Teknaf Wildlife Sanctuary and its surrounding community

Bibliographic Data

ID19587156
AuthorsM Asik Ullah (0000-0001-9411-1542, Kyushu University, corresponding author), S M Asik Ullah, Jun Tsuchiya (0000-0001-9581-5840, Kyushu University), Kazuo Asahiro (0000-0001-6278-307X, Kyushu University), Masakazu Tani (Kyushu University)
Year2022
Volume7
Pages100167
Publication date2022-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueTrees Forests and People (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2666-7193 • E-ISSN: 2666-7193
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.tfp.2021.100167
OpenAlexW4200572584
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited44

Bangladesh is experiencing deforestation within its protected forest areas (PAs). One reason for its inability to stem deforestation is the lack of a proper understanding of the deforestation process and the drivers responsible for it. This study aims to elucidate the socioeconomic factors influencing deforestation within a PA on the coast of Bangladesh known as Teknaf Wildlife Sanctuary (TWS). In the quest to understand the drivers of deforestation, the extent of community involvement in the deforestation process was explored. The local community was grouped based on their involvement in various deforestation drivers. These groups were then compared to determine the socioeconomic factors influencing the likelihood of their involvement in deforestation. The community survey covered 10% of households in the community surrounding TWS and involved interviewing 5769 household heads. This study found that 2150 households (37% of all surveyed households) were engaged in fuelwood collection, 623 (11%) were encroaching on the TWS, and 506 (9%) were cultivating betel leaves. Therefore, 45% of households were engaged in some form of deforestation driver. Among the socioeconomic factors, new households with small properties had a higher likelihood of being involved in deforestation drivers. Moreover, comparatively poor households had a significantly higher probability of being engaged in deforestation. Regarding occupations, farmers and laborers had a higher likelihood of being associated with deforestation. This study sheds light on the complex interplay of socioeconomic factors influencing the deforestation process occurring within a specific PA in Bangladesh under existing forest policies. This understanding can be useful for policymakers and forest managers in developing effective forest policies and managing forests more sustainably

Agriculture · Agroforestry · Biology · Business · Economics · Environmental health · Environmental protection · Forest degradation · Geography · Land degradation · Population · Socioeconomic status · Socioeconomics · Wildlife · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Environmental Science · Medicine · Oil Palm Production and Sustainability · Ecology

  • Forest Covers, Energy Use, and Economic Growth Nexus in the Tropics

    Open Access•Dagne Getachew Woldemedhin, Engdawork Assefa et al.•Trees Forests and People•2022

  • We need collaboration and co-creation to address challenges facing coastal communities

    Open Access•Debadayita Raha, Katherine Sian Davies-Vollum et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2024

  • Deforestation in the Teknaf Peninsula of Bangladesh

    Open Access•Masakazu Tani, Md Abiar Rahman•Deforestation in the Teknaf…•2018

  • Applied Logistic Regression

    David W Hosmer, Stanley Lemeshow•Applied logistic regression•2000

  • Returning forests analyzed with the forest identity

    Open Access•Pekka E Kauppi, Jesse H Ausubel et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2006

  • Classifying drivers of global forest loss

    Open Access•Paulette G Curtis, Christy M Slay et al.•Science•2018

  • Sixteen years of change in the global terrestrial human footprint and implications for biodiversity conservation

    Open Access•Oscar Venter, Eric W Sanderson et al.•Nature Communications•2016

  • Grand Theory and Context-Specificity in the Study of Forest Dynamics

    Stephen G Perz•The Professional Geographer•2007

  • A global-level assessment of the effectiveness of protected areas at resisting anthropogenic pressures

    Open Access•Jonas Geldmann, Andrea Manica et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2019

  • The performance and potential of protected areas

    Open Access•James E M Watson, Nicole Dudley et al.•Nature•2014

  • Impact of co-management on tree diversity and carbon sequestration in protected areas

    Open Access•Kazi Nazrul Islam, Mohammad Mahfuzur Rahman et al.•Trees Forests and People•2020

  • The Number and Spatial Distribution of Forest-Proximate People Globally

    Open Access•Peter Newton, Andrew Kinzer et al.•One Earth•2020

  • Carbon, biodiversity, and livelihoods in forest commons

    Open Access•Peter Newton, Johan A Oldekop et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2016

  • Comprehensive monitoring of Bangladesh tree cover inside and outside of forests, 2000–2014

    Open Access•Peter Potapov, Baktiar N Siddiqui et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2017

  • An assessment of deforestation and forest degradation drivers in developing countries

    Open Access•Noriko Hosonuma, Martin Herold et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2012

  • A global review of the impact of forest property rights interventions on poverty

    Open Access•D C Miller, Pushpendra Rana et al.•Global Environmental Change•2021

  • A global analysis of the social and environmental outcomes of community forests

    Open Access•Reem Hajjar, Johan A Oldekop et al.•Nature Sustainability•2020

  • Role of tenure insecurity in deforestation in Ghana's high forest zone

    Open Access•Lawrence Damnyag, Olli Saastamoinen et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2011

  • Social inclusion and deliberation in response to Redd+ in Nepal’s community forestry

    Open Access•Bishnu Prasad Devkota•Forest Policy and Economics•2019

  • Foreign donors driving policy change in recipient countries

    Open Access•Md Saifur Rahman, Md Nazmus Sadath et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2016

  • Forest transitions

    Open Access•T K Rudel, Oliver T Coomes et al.•Global Environmental Change•2005

  • Forest dependence is more than forest income

    Open Access•Lauren Nerfa, Jeanine M Rhemtulla et al.•World Development•2019

  • Participatory Governance Reform

    Open Access•Johanna Speer•World Development•2012

  • Environmental Income and Rural Livelihoods

    Open Access•Arild Angelsen, Pamela Jagger et al.•World Development•2014

  • The forest transition

    Open Access•E B Barbier, Joanne C Burgess et al.•Land Use Policy•2010

  • Land use transitions

    Open Access•Eric F Lambin, Patrick Meyfroidt•Land Use Policy•2009

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2024 (3)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae