Examining spatial and social characteristics of customary trees owned by villagers on public forestlands in Jharkhand, India
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19587239 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sabyasachi Kar (0000-0001-7141-5121, Clemson University), Roger C Lowe (0000-0002-4770-9936, University of Georgia), Roger Lowe, Ashok Kumar Chaudhary (0000-0002-5793-7393, University of Georgia), Puneet Dwivedi (0000-0001-6272-7473, Clemson University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 18 |
| Pages | 100661 |
| Publication date | 2024-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Trees Forests and People (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2666-7193 • E-ISSN: 2666-7193 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100661 |
| OpenAlex | W4401851902 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 14 |
This study analyzes the quantitative dimensions of customary tree ownership in public forestlands. • Trees under customary ownership exhibit clustering patterns based on tree characteristics. • A correlation exists between the number of customarily owned trees and the owners’ socioeconomic status. • Different forms of customary tree ownership affect tree characteristics and distribution. Tree ownership is typically tied to land ownership in many societies worldwide. Still, in India, tribal communities have customary ownership over trees in public forestlands, raising questions about what those trees are, where they are located, their characteristics, and whether socioeconomic factors influence their distribution and density. To address these questions, we conducted household interviews and a Global Positioning System (GPS) mapping in Sahritola, a village in the State of Jharkhand, India. We employed Kruskal Wallis, Spearman correlation, and Moran's Index to analyze the collected data. The villagers have been protecting and managing over 18,000 trees in public forestlands, including species such as asan ( Terminalia tomentosa) , sal ( Shorea robusta ), and mahua ( Madhuca longifolia ). Over 80 % of those trees are under individual ownership, while around 20 % are under shared ownership. Additionally, over 60 % of households owned between 100 and 500 trees. Customarily-owned tree species sharing similar characteristics (e.g., height, crown width, and diameter-at-breast-height) tend to cluster together. The number of customarily owned trees is influenced by their economic value and socioeconomic factors (e.g., religion, forestland, etc.). Additionally, the type of customary ownership (individual or shared) influences the characteristics of trees. This study could guide policymakers in potentially developing forest policies that consider the concept of customary tree ownership to promote sustainable management of forest resources in India and beyond
Agroforestry · Biology · Economics · Geography · Socioeconomics · Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management · Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology · Urban Agriculture and Sustainability
Correlation Coefficients
Characterising the relationship between forest dependent peoples and state forest management institutions in the Global South
Are there Customary Rights to Plants? An Inquiry among the Baganda (Uganda), with Special Attention to Gender
Beyond Ostrom
Socioeconomic stratification by wealth ranking
Community Participation and Forest Policies in India
Participatory rural appraisal (PRA)
Indigenous tree tenure in the times of charismatic carnivore conservation
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |