Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Interpreting the Other

Intellectual History and Cultural Difference

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19589986
AutoresMALINI MURALI (autor de correspondencia)
Año2020
Volumen01
Número02
Páginas2050007
Fecha de publicación2020-07-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaThe Journal of Indian and Asian Studies (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2717-5413 • E-ISSN: 2717-5766
EditorialWorld Scientific Pub Co Pte Lt (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1142/s2717541320500072
OpenAlexW3066503422
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas3

This paper argues that higher education in India, especially in the field of humanities and area studies, continues to be a Euro-American inheritance. Even when area studies attempt to offer a critique of the post-Enlightenment construction of universal human nature by locating the human in diverse cultural specificities, the discipline is still unable to configure the ‘context’ outside conceptual boundaries of the West. For instance, studies of culture seem to take historical narrativity as a cultural universal. That is to say, even when cultures do not privilege clear-cut notions of history or philosophy, the assumption is that it should be possible to unravel the historical or philosophical impulses of these cultures by studying the kind of narratives that the cultures have produced. The primacy of the narrative as the life-giving and meaning-making source in an essentially chaotic world is grounded, it seems to me, in Western onto-theology. This narrative model is incapable of studying mnemocultures (cultures of memory) like India (and Asia), for even when the culture produces diverse and heterogenous narrative weaves like itihasa, purana and kavya, the narrative does not enjoy a privileged status in these cultural forms. These compositions have a performative significance whose meaning is not found or guided by presence of the narrative or its potential for truth and identity. This paper will show that positivist historiographic assumptions regarding cultural forms in the non-West, especially in the Indian context, are ill-equipped to engage with traditions that lie outside the heritage of the West. Such attempts to situate an ancient past as embodied in cultural forms extraneous to the Western metaphysic are really accounts of self-understanding of the latter. The receptions of Keralamahatmyam purana in modern intellectual discourses set against the existence of the purana in living traditions of performance outside the confines of the university will be used as a case in point to elucidate the incapability of existing conceptual categories in the humanities discourse to configure cultural difference

Aesthetics · Art · Enlightenment · Epistemology · Literature · Narrative · Narrativity · Sociology · History · Indian History and Philosophy · Philosophy

  • The collected essays of A.K. Ramanujan

    A K Ramanujan•The collected essays of A.K.…•1999

  • The Past Before Us

    Romila Thapar•Past Before Us•2013

  • The Principle of Reason

    Jacques Derrida, Caitlin Porter et al.•diacritics•1983

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae