Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Hidden in plain sight

A systematic review of coercion and Long-Acting Reversible Contraceptive methods (Larc)

Dados Bibliográficos

ID19590943
AutoresVictoria Boydell (0000-0001-5051-9167), Robert D Smith (0000-0002-4880-6009), Global LARC Collaborative
EditoresAteeb Ahmad Parray (0000-0002-1653-1856)
Ano2023
Volume3
Fascículo8
Páginase0002131
Data de publicação2023-08-18
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
EditoraPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0002131
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas55

In recent years there has been extensive promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARC) globally to increase access to what is widely considered a highly effective contraceptive method. Yet, despite these efforts, evidence points towards the worrying propensity for LARCS to be associated with coercion. Hence, we undertook a meta-narrative review across nine databases to draw together the heterogeneous and complex evidence on the coercive practices associated with LARC programs. A total of 92 papers were grouped into three metanarratives: (1) law, (2) public health and medicine, and (3) the social sciences. Across disciplines, the evidence supports the conclusion that coercive practices surrounding LARC programs always target marginalized, disadvantaged and excluded population(s). Looking at coercion across disciplines reveals its many forms, and we present a continuum of coercive practices associated with LARC programming. We found that each discipline provides only a partial picture of coercion, and this fragmentation is a knowledge practice that prevents us from collecting accurate information on this subject and may contribute to the perpetuation of these suspect practices. We present this review to address longstanding silences around coercion and LARCs, and to encourage the development of clinical and programmatic guidance to actively safeguard against coercion and uphold reproductive rights and justice

  • The Right Prescription for Family Bliss

    Open Access•Nyigit Wudi Amini, Falih Suaedi et al.•Social Sciences•2024

  • Social Media Descriptions of Pain and Pain Management During Intrauterine Device Insertion

    Open Access•George G Schweitzer, Gabrielle Schweitzer et al.•Women s Health Issues•2025

  • Concealed coexistence

    Open Access•Laura Burke•Medical Anthropology Quarterly•2026

  • Racial/Ethnic and Socioeconomic Disparities of Contraceptive Preference-Use Match in the United States

    Open Access•Jusung Lee, Krista J Howard et al.•Journal of Racial and Ethnic…•2025

  • Appraising the quality of qualitative research

    Open Access•Denis Walsh, Soo Downe•Midwifery•2006

  • Epistemic injustice in academic global health

    Open Access•Himani Bhakuni, Seye Abimbola•The Lancet Global Health•2021

  • Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making

    Open Access•Christine Dehlendorf, Kira Levy et al.•Contraception•2013

  • Under (implicit) pressure

    Open Access•Anne M Gomez, Mikaela Wapman•Contraception•2017

  • ‘I haven’t heard much about other methods’

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz, Erin E Pearson et al.•BMJ Global Health•2021

  • Feminism, Social Policy, and Long-Acting Contraception

    Hilde Lindemann Nelson, James Lindemann Nelson•The Hastings Center Report•1995

  • Routledge International Handbook of Ignorance Studies

    Open Access•M Gro, Matthias Gross et al.•Routledge International Handbook…•2022

  • Achieving the Goal of the London Summit on Family Planning By Adhering to Voluntary, Rights-Based Family Planning

    Karen Hardee, Shannon Harris et al.•International Perspectives on…•2014

  • Provider Perspectives of Barriers to Contraceptive Access and Use among Women with Substance Use Disorders

    Open Access•Elizabeth Charron, Farah Tahsin et al.•Women s Health Issues•2021

  • What Are Women Told When Requesting Family Planning Services at Clinics Associated with Catholic Hospitals? A Mystery Caller Study

    Open Access•Maryam Guiahi, Stephanie Teal et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2017

  • The Fine Line Between Informing and Coercing

    Open Access•M Antonia Biggs, Lucia Tome et al.•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2020

  • Reproductive Autonomy Is Nonnegotiable, Even in the Time of Covid ‐19

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz, Jeanette A Higgins•Perspectives on Sexual and…•2020

  • Control and the Dalkon Shield

    Open Access•Lisa Baker•Violence Against Women•2001

  • Vulnerable birth mothers and repeat losses of infants to public care

    Karen Broadhurst, Mike Shaw et al.•The Journal of Social Welfare Law•2015

  • Global biopolitics and the history of world health

    Open Access•Alison Bashford•History of the Human Sciences•2006

  • Soft Sterilization

    Open Access•Della J Winters, Adria Ryan McLaughlin•Affilia•2019

  • Reproductive Technologies and the Law

    Margot Young, Margot E Young•Marriage & Family Review•1995

  • Realizing Reproductive Health Equity Needs More Than Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (Larc)

    Aline C Gubrium, Emily S Mann et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2016

  • The Impact of Reproductive Health Legislation on Family Planning Clinic Services in Texas

    Kari White, Kristine Hopkins et al.•American Journal of Public Health•2015

  • Incentives and Disincentives in the Indian Family Welfare Program

    Jay Satia, J K Satia et al.•Studies in Family Planning•1986

  • Listening to Women

    Open Access•Ellie Smith, Beth Sundstrom et al.•Journal of Social Issues•2020

  • Reproductive Anxiety and Conditional Agency at the Intersections of Privilege

    Open Access•P R Grzanka, Elena Schuch•Journal of Social Issues•2020

  • I was obligated to accept

    Open Access•Leigh Senderowicz•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Moving targets

    Cecilia Van Hollen•Reproductive Health Matters•1998

  • For Reproductive Justice in an Era of Gates and Modi

    Open Access•K Wilson•Feminist Review•2018

  • The age of Larc

    Jenny Dyck Brian, P R Grzanka et al.•Health Sociology Review•2020

  • Racism and Disparities in Women's Use of the Depo-Provera Injection in the Contemporary USA

    Open Access•Thomas W Volscho•Critical Sociology•2011

  • Dynamics of wilful blindness

    Open Access•J Bovensiepen, M Pelkmans•Critique of Anthropology•2020

  • Debilitated Lifeworlds

    Open Access•Julieta Chaparro‐buitrago•Medical Anthropology Quarterly•2022

  • Reproductive governance in Latin America

    Lynn M Morgan, E F S Roberts et al.•Anthropology and Medicine•2012

  • Agency-Without-Choice

    Open Access•Emily S Mann, P R Grzanka•Symbolic Interaction•2018

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano2
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2026 (3)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae