Implementing supportive supervision in acute humanitarian emergencies

Lessons learned from Afghanistan and Ukraine

Bibliographic Data

ID19590974
AuthorsNadeen Abujaber (0000-0001-7951-6269, Trinity College Dublin, corresponding author), Meg Ryan (0000-0002-4719-5840, Trinity College Dublin, corresponding author), Kelly A McBride (corresponding author), Pia Tingsted Blum (corresponding author), Michelle Engels (0000-0002-3782-1609, corresponding author), Anna Didenko (corresponding author), Hannah Green (0000-0003-1823-4158, corresponding author), Catia Sofia Peres de Matos (corresponding author), Shona Whitton (corresponding author), Frédérique Vallières (0000-0001-6315-3029, Trinity College Dublin, corresponding author)
EditorsSaloni Dev (0000-0003-3385-7249)
Year2024
Volume4
Issue4
Pagese0002416
Publication date2024-04-17
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0002416
PMID38630740
OpenAlexW4394874531
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited21

Mental Health and Psychosocial Support (MHPSS) practitioners working in humanitarian contexts are at significant risk of mental health conditions, ultimately hindering the quality and sustainability of their work. Supportive supervision has shown to be effective in improving the wellbeing of MHPSS staff and volunteers and enhancing the effectiveness of MHPSS service delivery. Despite these proven benefits, there is a lack of standardised guidelines to inform supportive supervision within humanitarian contexts. To address this gap, the Trinity Centre for Global Health and the International Federation of the Red Cross Red Crescent Societies’ Reference Centre for Psychocosial Support co-developed the ‘Integrated Model for Supervision’ (IMS) Handbook and supporting tools and led IMS trainings with four humanitarian organisations in Ukraine, Afghanistan, Jordan, and Nigeria from June-August 2021. The subsequent acute humanitarian emergencies that occurred in Afghanistan and Ukraine provided the opportunity to (i) examine the implementation of the IMS in the acute stages of two humanitarian crises and (ii) identify the challenges and lessons learned from this process. This study employed a case study design using semi-structured qualitative interviews with five MHPSS personnel (female: 4; male: 1) who had received training in the IMS and were directly involved in the implementation of supportive supervision using IMS guidelines in either Ukraine or Afghanistan. Results showed that participants identified the key steps needed for the implementation of supportive supervision and reported two significant barriers to implementation including the stress of a humanitarian crisis leading to competing responsibilities and priorities, staff shortages and time constraints as well as the challenge of creating a new supervision structure when none had existed previously. Overall, participants felt that the IMS resulted in improved knowledge, confidence, perceived support, team cohesion, staff wellbeing and was a helpful blueprint to guide the implementation of supportive supervision in humanitarian contexts

Economic shortage · Humanitarian aid · Humanitarian crisis · Mental health · Political science · Psychosocial · Psychosocial support · Public relations · Refugee · Sustainability · Engineering · Medicine · Mental Health Treatment and Access · Migration, Health and Trauma · Nursing · Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research