Uptake of community antiretroviral group delivery models for persons living with HIV in Arua district, Uganda

A parallel convergent mixed methods study

Datos Bibliográficos

ID19590980
AutoresLars Ole Sauerberg (0000-0003-3208-7801, autor de correspondencia), Wani Muzeyi (0000-0002-6337-7636), Semeere Aggrey, Dennis Kalibbala (0000-0002-5003-0414), Thomas Katairo (0000-0002-2002-8911), Fred C Semitala (0000-0002-0624-7640), Achilles Katamba (0000-0002-2347-4183), Irene Ayakaka (0000-0003-1051-5684), Nelson Kalema
EditoresHenry Zakumumpa (0000-0002-8169-1151)
Año2023
Volumen3
Número2
Páginase0000633
Fecha de publicación2023-02-23
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaPLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
EditorialPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0000633
OpenAlexW36962948
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas3
Referencias citadas12

Community antiretroviral groups (CAGs) is one of the innovative and efficient differentiated service delivery models (DSDM) for reaching persons needing human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) treatment in the community. Since DSDM adoption in Uganda, evidence suggests better care outcomes for patients in DSDM compared to counterparts in routine health facility care. However, uptake of CAG models for eligible community groups of persons living with HIV (PLHIV) has been slow in Arua district, Uganda and stakeholders’ perceptions regarding its implementation unexplored. The objective of the study was to determine the uptake, barriers and facilitators influencing CAG model implementation in Arua district, Uganda. We conducted a parallel convergent mixed-methods study from March 2020 to December 2020 at Adumi health centre IV and Kuluva hospital in Arua district. We enrolled and extracted data for every fifth virally suppressed participant on antiretroviral therapy (ART) at the two health facilities. Data were analysed using STATA 13.0. Uptake was determined as the proportion of eligible PLHIV that were enrolled into a group. We performed logistic regression to determine factors associated with uptake. We conducted one focus group discussion per facility among healthcare workers involved in the management of PLHIV. We also conducted 7 focus group discussions among PLHIV across the two facilities. Thematic analysis was used to describe the data. A total of 399 PLHIV were eligible for CAG, 61.6% were female, and 44.9% were on dolutegravir (DTG) based regimen. Uptake was 6.8%, 95% CI (4.7–9.7) and was found to be significantly associated with being divorced or separated in a marriage (OR; 0.14, 95%CI; 0.02–0.92, P = 0.014). Members picking drugs in turns, comforting and encouraging others to take the drugs, and health workers advising them to join and stay with other group members were perceived as facilitators to uptake of community antiretroviral group delivery model. Having few and distant eligible members in the local area to form a group, lack of transport among the member to pick the drugs when it’s their turn, misunderstandings and lack of confidentiality amongst the members, and lack of partner disclosure were perceived as barriers to uptake of community antiretroviral group delivery model. Uptake of community antiretroviral group delivery model in Arua district is very low. There may be a need to support community antiretroviral group delivery models with income- generating activities, transport facilitation, closer community drug pick-up points and improved partner disclosure support mechanisms among married group members

Historical and Archaeological Studies · Lexicography and Language Studies · Medicine · Narrative Theory and Analysis