Evaluation of a cross-border field simulation exercise on the response to outbreaks of infectious diseases in Namanga, Kenya and Tanzania
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19591656 |
|---|---|
| Authors | John Sackey Dzaba (0009-0004-7397-7274, Universität Hamburg, corresponding author), Hilary Kagume Njenge (0000-0001-5388-0089, corresponding author), James Wakhungu, James Nyongesa Wakhungu (Ministry of Agriculture Livestock and Fisheries, corresponding author), Ralf Reintjes (Universität Hamburg, corresponding author), Nicola Watt (0009-0004-7112-3590, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit, corresponding author) |
| Editors | Claire J Standley (0000-0002-4291-9723) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 10 |
| Pages | e0003832 |
| Publication date | 2024-10-16 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | PLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375 |
| Publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003832 |
| PMID | 39413094 |
| OpenAlex | W4403448522 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 19 |
Travel and trade, whilst playing a critical role in economic development, contribute to the spread of infectious diseases, including novel or emerging diseases, which can threaten health security locally, regionally and globally. The World Health Organization mandates preparedness through field simulation exercises to address infectious disease outbreaks, as highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. This study assessed the impact of the 2019 Namanga field simulation exercise, conducted in the border town shared by Kenya and Tanzania, on improving cross-border outbreak preparedness and response. It focused on participants’ knowledge, skills acquisition and real-world application. An anonymous online survey was administered to participants 37 months post-field simulation exercise. In addition, key informant interviews and a focus group discussion with the Joint Border Management Committee in Namanga were conducted. The June 2019 field simulation exercise enhanced the skills, knowledge, and confidence of participants, including members of the border community, in preparing for and responding to outbreaks including COVID-19. The skills and knowledge gained were deemed valuable, relevant, and effective for use in future response activities. The analysis is limited by potential response bias, as only participants with positive experiences of the field simulation exercise may have responded more favourably. Addressing the limitations of design and implementation of the field simulation exercise and the challenges of cross-border response identified in this study are critical to optimising future responses
Disease · Environmental health · Environmental planning · Geography · Outbreak · Pandemic · Political science · Preparedness · Tanzania · Medicine · Migration, Health and Trauma · Travel-related health issues · Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
Health security capacities in the context of Covid-19 outbreak
Qualitative Content Analysis
Systematic methodological review
The qualitative content analysis process
National Biosafety Management System
The role of emergency preparedness exercises in the response to a mass casualty terrorist incident
Educating, training, and exercising for infectious disease control with emphasis on cross-border settings
Simulation exercises and after action reviews – analysis of outputs during 2016–2019 to strengthen global health emergency preparedness and response
Uganda’s experience in Ebola virus disease outbreak preparedness, 2018–2019
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |