Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Essential newborn care practices in health facilities of Nepal

Evidence from Nepal Health Facility Survey 2015 and 2021

Bibliographic Data

ID19594672
AuthorsAchyut Raj Pandey (0000-0002-1037-1273), Bikram Adhikari (0000-0002-4299-9233), Bipul Lamichhane (0000-0002-2501-093X), Bishnu Prasad Dulal (0000-0003-3588-5112), Bishnu Dulal, Saugat Pratap K C, Deepa Joshi (0000-0001-8539-7411), Deepak Joshi (0009-0009-3602-6249), Sushil Chandra Baral, Sushil Baral (0000-0002-3425-6915)
EditorsJulia Robinson (0000-0003-0719-3995)
Year2024
Volume4
Issue4
Pagese0002069
Publication date2024-04-25
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0002069
PMID38662747
OpenAlexW4395481345
LanguageEN
References cited4

Availability of newborn care practices in health facilities (HFs) plays an important role in improving the survival and well-being of newborns. In this paper, we aimed to assess practice of carrying out different newborn care practices among HFs between 2015 and 2021, and associated factors in Nepal. We analyzed data of 621 and 786 HFs offering delivery and newborn care services from Nepal Health Facility Surveys 2015 and 2021, respectively. We summarized categorical variables with a weighted percent and 95% confidence interval (CI). We estimated weighted unadjusted absolute difference in percentage of different newborn care practices between 2015 and 2021, and its 95% CI using binomial regression model. We applied univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis to determine the factors associated with the availability of all seven newborn care practices. The percentage of HFs carrying out all seven newborn care practices was 50.5% (95% CI: 44.6, 56.3) in 2015 and 83.7% (95% CI: 79.8, 87.0) in 2021 with an overall difference of 33.3 percent points (95% CI: 26.4, 40.1). The proportion of HFs reporting all seven newborn care practices increased significantly between 2015 and 2021 in each all three ecological regions and in provinces except Madhesh and Gandaki. In 2021, private hospitals had lower odds of carrying out all seven newborn care practices compared to federal/provincial hospitals (AOR = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.11, 0.63). Similarly, in 2021, the odds of HFs carrying out all seven newborn care practices was 2.87 (95% CI: 1.06, 8.31) times higher in Sudurpashchim compared to Koshi province. In 2021, HFs carrying out seven newborn care practices did not differ significantly based on ecological belts, quality assurance activities, external supervision, delivery service-related training, and frequency of HF meetings. In conclusion, there has been significant improvement in proportion of facilities carrying out seven essential newborn care practices between 2015 and 2021. Type of facility and provinces were associated with the HFs carrying out seven newborn care practices in Nepal

Binomial regression · Confidence interval · Environmental health · Family medicine · Health care · Health facility · Health services · Logistic regression · Odds · Odds ratio · Population · Child Nutrition and Water Access · Demography · Global Maternal and Child Health · Infant Development and Preterm Care · Medicine · Internal Medicine

  • Global, regional, and national progress towards Sustainable Development Goal 3.2 for neonatal and child health

    Open Access•Katherine R Paulson, Katherine Paulson et al.•The Lancet•2021

  • Estimating Model-Adjusted Risks, Risk Differences, and Risk Ratios From Complex Survey Data

    G S Bieler, Gayle Bieler et al.•American Journal of Epidemiology•2010

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae