Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evidence from the first Shared Medical Appointments (SMAs) randomised controlled trial in India

SMAs increase the satisfaction, knowledge, and medication compliance of patients with glaucoma

Bibliographic Data

ID19594682
AuthorsNazlı Sönmez (0000-0003-2793-1561, European School of Management and Technology, corresponding author), Kavitha Srinivasan (0000-0002-9796-6981, Aravind Eye Hospital, corresponding author), Rengaraj Venkatesh (0000-0001-7741-324X, Aravind Eye Hospital, corresponding author), Ryan W Buell (0000-0002-6779-8593, Harvard University, corresponding author), Kamalini Ramdas (0000-0002-5047-5333, London Business School, corresponding author)
EditorsMadhukar Pai (0000-0003-3667-4536)
Year2023
Volume3
Issue7
Pagese0001648
Publication date2023-07-20
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePLOS Global Public Health (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2767-3375 • E-ISSN: 2767-3375
PublisherPublic Library of Science (PLoS) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1371/journal.pgph.0001648
PMID37471312
OpenAlexW4384925986
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited26

In Shared Medical Appointments (SMAs), patients with similar conditions meet the physician together and each receives one-on-one attention. SMAs can improve outcomes and physician productivity. Yet privacy concerns have stymied adoption. In physician-deprived nations, patients’ utility from improved access may outweigh their disutility from loss of privacy. Ours is to our knowledge the first SMA trial for any disease, in India, where doctors are scarce. In a 1,000-patient, single-site, randomized controlled trial at Aravind Eye Hospital, Pondicherry, we compared SMAs and one-on-one appointments, over four successive visits, for patients with glaucoma. We examined patients’ satisfaction, knowledge, intention-to-follow-up, follow-up rates, and medication compliance rates (primary outcomes) using intention-to-treat analysis. Of 1,034 patients invited between July 12, 2016 –July 19, 2018, 1,000 (96.7%) consented to participate, and were randomly assigned to either SMAs ( N SMA = 500) or one-on-one appointments ( N 1-1 = 500). Patients who received SMAs showed higher satisfaction ( Mean SMA = 4.955 (SD 0.241), Mean 1-1 = 4.920 (SD 0.326); difference in means 0.035; 95% CI, 0.017–0.054, p = 0.0002) and knowledge ( Mean SMA = 3.416 (SD 1.340), Mean 1-1 = 3.267 (SD 1.492); difference in means 0.149; 95% CI, 0.057–0.241, p = 0.002) than patients who received one-on-one appointments. Across conditions, there was no difference in patients’ intention-to-follow-up ( Mean SMA = 4.989 (SD 0.118), Mean 1-1 = 4.986 (SD 0.149); difference in means 0.003; 95% CI, -0.006–0.012, p = 0.481) and actual follow-up rates ( Mean SMA = 87.5% (SD 0.372), Mean 1-1 = 88.7% (SD 0.338); difference in means -0.012; 95% CI, -0.039–0.015, p = 0.377). Patients who received SMAs exhibited higher medication compliance rates ( Mean SMA = 97.0% (SD 0.180), Mean 1-1 = 94.9% (SD 0.238); difference in means 0.020; 95% CI, 0.004–0.036, p = 0.013). SMAs improved satisfaction, learning, and medication compliance, without compromising follow-up rates or measured clinical outcomes. Peer interruptions were negatively correlated with patient satisfaction in early-trial SMAs and positively correlated with patient satisfaction in later-trial SMAs. Trial registration : The trial was registered with Clinical Trials Registry of India ( https://ctri.nic.in/ ) with reference no. REF/2016/11/012659 and registration no. CTRI/2018/02/011998

Family medicine · Glaucoma · Patient satisfaction · Physical therapy · Randomized controlled trial · Significant difference · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Medicine · Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare · Psychology · Internal Medicine · Ophthalmology · Pediatrics · Surgery

  • Economic outcomes among microfinance group members receiving community-based chronic disease care

    Open Access•M Wilson-Barthes, J Steingrimsson et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • The Lancet NCDI Poverty Commission

    Open Access•Gene Bukhman, Ana Olga Mocumbi et al.•The Lancet•2020

  • What is the private sector? Understanding private provision in the health systems of low-income and middle-income countries

    Open Access•Maureen Mackintosh, Amos Channon et al.•The Lancet•2016

  • Health care and equity in India

    Open Access•Yarlini Balarajan, Sakthivel Selvaraj et al.•The Lancet•2011

  • Patients' compliance with medical treatments in the third world. What do we know

    Open Access•Nuria Homedes, Antonio Ugalde•Health Policy and Planning•1993

Citations per year0.5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae