Validez de criterio del ángulo lumbo-horizontal en flexión como medida de la extensibilidad isquiosural en adultos jóvenes.(Criterion-related validity of the lumbo-horizontal angle in flexion as a measure of hamstring muscle extensibility in young adults)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19690830 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pedro Ángel López-Miñarro (0000-0002-6739-3131, Universidad de Murcia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue | 13 |
| Pages | 25-31 |
| Publication date | 2010-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Cultura Ciencia y Deporte (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1696-5043 • E-ISSN: 1989-7413 |
| Publisher | UCAM CCD (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.12800/ccd.v5i13.67 |
| OpenAlex | W1984354453 |
| Language | ES |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 1 |
One hundred and eight males (mean age: 21.98 ± 4.01 years) and 98 females (mean age: 22.12 ± 3.86 years) were asked to perform the straight leg raise (left and right legs), back-saver sit-and-reach (left and right legs), unilateral sit-and-reach (left and right legs), sit-and-reach, toe-touch, and V sit-and-reach tests in a randomized order. The lumbo-horizontal angle was measured when the participants reached maximal trunk flexion with knees extended. The ANOVA analysis showed significant differences for the lumbosacral angle among tests (p < 0.001). The concurrent validity of the lumbo-horizontal angle with regard to the straight leg raise was low to moderate for males (r = 0.44 – 0.58) and moderate for females (r = 0.56 – 0.70). In conclusion, administration procedures of sit-and-reach tests influence the lumbo-sacral angle in flexion. The sit-and-reach and toe-touch tests, and the unilateral sit-and-reach are the tests that reach the highest concurrent criterionrelated validity for males and females, respectively, for measuring hamstring muscle extensibility
Humanities · Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation · Philosophy · Psychology · Shoulder Injury and Treatment · Sports injuries and prevention
| Citations per year | 0.07 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2012 - 2012 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |