The Thought of Mou Zongsan

Bibliographic Data

ID19901451
AuthorsNatalie Chan (0000-0002-5813-4779, corresponding author), N Serina Chan
Year2011
Pages339
Publication date2011-11-11
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueThe thought of Mou Zongsan (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherBrill (PUBLISHER • NL)
DOI10.1163/ej.9789004212114.i-340
OpenAlexW2132976384
Open LibraryOL29653474M
ISBN9789004212114
LanguageEN
Citations received12

This study introduces and examines the thought of Mou Zongsan 牟宗三 (1909-1995), generally recognised as the most creative and systematic Xin Rujia 新儒家 (New Confucian) thinker. Because very little about his thought has been written in English, this study contributes to the understanding and interpretation of Chinese thought by filling a gap in Western scholarship on a key twentieth-century Ru thinker. The study accomplishes four objectives. The first objective is to examine the making of Mou’s thought by tracing the various influences that shaped his philosophical thinking. Mou’s thought is multi-faceted and complex. It reflects the historical time he lived in, the person he was, and the many ideological and intellectual influences that \nshaped his thinking. Scholars usually regard Mou’s thought as a contemporary moral metaphysical reading of Ru thought based on the Lu-Wang Learning of the Mind, the stream of Song-Ming Ruxue (Neo-Confucianism) associated with Lu Xiangshan 陸象山 (1139-1193) and Wang Yangming 王陽明 (1472-1529). Yet, as this thesis shows, Mou’s thought is also cultural nationalist, anti-Communist, moral idealistic, Hegelian, and Kantian. The second objective of this thesis is to introduce Mou’s thought as a contemporary reading of Ruxue—in the form of a moral metaphysics based on the Lu-Wang Learning of the Mind. Mou’s moral metaphysics reflects his understanding of the human mind as informed by the teachings of Mengzi 孟子 (Mencius) (ca 372-289 B.C.), the Lu-Wang Learning of the Mind, and the writings of Song-Ming Ru thinkers besides Lu and Wang. It seeks to elucidate the metaphysics of the Lu-Wang Learning of the Mind using Mahāyāna Fo (Buddhist) paradigms and Kantian terminology. The third objective is to reveal the strong Han cultural nationalism that drove Mou’s philosophical career. While most scholars recognise that a major, if not the most significant, contribution of Mou is in the metaphysical development of Ru thought, much of his writings can be seen as a relentless attempt to provide a systematic and theoretical grounding for his proposal for China’s cultural reconstruction, a proposal known as the santong 三統 (three-unities) proposal. My aim is to show that Mou’s moral metaphysics and cultural nationalist discourse are entwined. I examine his conception of Chinese culture and Ruxue and his notion of the third epoch of Ruxue. I also study his santong proposal, his new daotong 新道統discourse (new genealogical account of the transmission of the way), which is based on his revisionist assessment of Song-Ming Ruxue, and the key role he played in the Xin Rujia movement. The last objective is to examine critically the scholarly reception of Mou’s thought and discuss how the legacy of Mou’s Xin Rujia thought has lived on. Mou’s system of thought is rigorously logical and coherent when assessed in terms of its internal philosophical premises and paradigms. Supporters embrace and acclaim it. Distracters, however, find fault with it, sometimes harshly. I highlight the major merits and deficiencies of Mou’s thought as perceived by his critics

Art · Epistemology · Genius · Hegelianism · Key (lock) · Linguistics · Literature · Metaphysics · Terminology · Chinese history and philosophy · Philosophy · 20th century · chinese · Chinese Philosophy · Zongsan Mou

Tools

Open DOILibgenOpen Access