Really Existing Nationalisms
A Post-Communist View from Marx and Engels
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19904963 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erica Benner (St Antony's College, Oxford, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1995 |
| Pages | 266 |
| Publication date | 1995-12-28 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Really existing nationalisms (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Oxford University PressOxford (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1093/0198279590.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W2483774392 |
| Open Library | OL787941M |
| ISBN | 9780198279594 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 22 |
It is widely thought that Marx and Engels lacked a coherent understanding of nationalism. With the collapse of communist regimes and the resurgence of national and ethnic conflicts after the Cold War, the belief has spread that all forms of ‘Marxist’ thought – starting with that of its founders – were doomed by their insensitivity to national claims. This book questions these assumptions. Rejecting the tendency to read what Marx and Engels wrote through the prism of later events, it situates their writings on national issues in their original nineteenth‐century context. A close, contextual re‐reading of their writings shows that the two men had a far more perceptive understanding of national identity and conflict than is usually supposed. Their rigorously anti‐idealist approach was not the by‐product of a dogmatic ‘materialist’ or class‐centred theory, but a deliberate reaction against the rise of romantic and ethnocentric nationalism in their native Germany and beyond. By comparison with contemporaries such as Mazzini or John Stuart Mill, Marx and Engels had a clear grasp of nationalism's ethical ambivalence, particularly in the context of international relations. They recognised that although many national movements had liberating aims, they also had the potential to become a new cause of war, and thus to set back the reforms supported by liberals and republicans as well as communists. These elements of their thinking can be developed to criticize present‐day accounts that exaggerate the independent force of nationalism in history or contemporary politics. One need not be a ‘Marxist’ to appreciate the continuing relevance of such ideas
Aesthetics · Ambivalence · Communism · Context (archaeology) · Epistemology · Marxist philosophy · Materialism · National identity · Nationalism · Political science · Politics · Psychoanalysis · Sociology · Central European national history · European Political History Analysis · History · Law · Philosophy · Nationalism and communism
The Ethics of Nationalism
Is there a core national doctrine
The Cambridge History of Philosophy in the Nineteenth Century (1790–1870)
Orientalism Today
After Said
The Ethics of Nationalism
Autonomía de la política y republicanismo en Karl Marx
Introducing geological wonder
“Horseman, Pass By!”
Scotland, Catalonia and the ‘right’ to self-determination
Marx at the Margins
Globalisation, ethnicity and the nation‐state
Marxism, cosmopolitanism and 'the' Jews
Marx's late writings on non-Western and precapitalist societies and gender
Military Marxism and Africa’s ‘community-to-come’
Nationalism as a national danger?” Early Romanian socialists and the paradoxes of the national question (1880–1914)
Recovering Reparative Readings of Postcolonialism and Marxism
Are there Good and Bad Nationalisms
Why is the Nation‐State so Vulnerable to Ethnic Nationalism
Marxism and nationalism in the era of globalization
Is the Homo in Homocapitalism the Caste in Caste Capitalism and the Racial in Racial Capitalism
Levine on the Marxian Tradition
| Unique citing works | 22 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,79 |
| Citation span | 1998 - 2026 (29) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 20 |