Roman Tragedy
Theatre to Theatricality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19923843 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mario Erasmo (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2004 |
| Publication date | 2004-12-31 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Roman Tragedy (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | University of Texas Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.7560/702424 |
| OpenAlex | W4231455891 |
| ISBN | 9780292797543 |
| Open Library | OL3288950M |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 52 |
Roman tragedies were written for over three hundred years, but only fragments remain of plays that predate the works of Seneca in the mid-first century C.E., making it difficult to define the role of tragedy in ancient Roman culture. Nevertheless, in this pioneering book, Mario Erasmo draws on all the available evidence to trace the evolution of Roman tragedy from the earliest tragedians to the dramatist Seneca and to explore the role played by Roman culture in shaping the perception of theatricality on and off the stage. Performing a philological analysis of texts informed by semiotic theory and audience reception, Erasmo pursues two main questions in this study: how does Roman tragedy become metatragedy, and how did off-stage theatricality come to compete with the theatre? Working chronologically, he looks at how plays began to incorporate a rhetoricized reality on stage, thus pointing to their own theatricality. And he shows how this theatricality, in turn, came to permeate society, so that real events such as the assassination of Julius Caesar took on theatrical overtones, while Pompey's theatre opening and the lavish spectacles of the emperor Nero deliberately blurred the lines between reality and theatre. Tragedy eventually declined as a force in Roman culture, Erasmo suggests, because off-stage reality became so theatrical that on-stage tragedy could no longer compete
Art · Literature · Tragedy (event) · Classical Antiquity Studies · History · Joseph Conrad and Literature · Shakespeare, Adaptation, and Literary Criticism · Classical literature · Classical literature, history and criticism · History and criticism · Latin drama (Tragedy) · Rome · Theater · to 500
Senecan Drama and the Age of Nero
Seneca and Augustan Culture
Hellenistic Tragedy and Satyr-Drama; Lycophron’s Alexandra
Beyond Athens
Philosophers and the State under Nero
The Exagōgē of Ezekiel the Tragedian
The Dialogue in Seneca’s Dialogues (and Other Moral Essays)
Nero in Hollywood
Petronius, Realism, Nero
Nero and the Senate
Theory and Practice in Seneca’s Writings
Greek Tragedy After the Fifth Century
Nero’s Women
Seneca and the Quest for Glory in Nero’s Golden Age
Art and the Decadent City
Seneca Redivivus
Seneca’s Apocolocyntosis
Seneca’s Shame
Style and Form in Seneca’s Writing
Exploring Appearances
Senecan Emotions
Introduction
The Neronian “Symptom”
“Ain’t Sayin’”
Seneca’s Originality
Theater and Theatricality in Seneca’s World
Seneca
Seneca and the Moderns
Lucan’s Civil War in Nero’s Rome
Nero’s Memory in Flavian Rome
Seneca and the Christian Tradition
Society and Politics in Post-Fifth-Century Tragedy
Seneca on Monarchy and the Political Life
Seneca and Neronian Rome
Nero the Performer
Senecan Selves
Absent Presence in Seneca’s Epistles
Nero
Senecan Tragedy
Senecan Political Thought from the Middle Ages to Early Modernity
Seneca and the Ancient World
Seneca’s Images and Metaphors
Attitudes Towards Tragedy from the Second Sophistic to Late Antiquity
Seneca Multiplex
Nero’s Imperial Administration
Greek Tragedy in the Fourth Century
Seneca and Epicurus
The Cambridge Companion to Seneca
The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Nero
Staging Roman Slavery in the Second Century Bce
Cicero's Use of Aeschylus' Oresteia in the Pro Milone
Recognition and the Character of Seneca's Medea
| Citations per year | 4.73 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2015 - 2019 (5) |
| Highly cited | No |