Inventing the Immigration Problem
The Dillingham Commission and Its Legacy
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19931018 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Katherine Benton-Cohen (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Pages | 330 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-31 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Inventing the Immigration Problem (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Harvard University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.4159/9780674985667 |
| OpenAlex | W2885925793 |
| Open Library | OL29792014M |
| ISBN | 9780674985667 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 27 |
In 1907 the U.S. Congress created a joint commission to investigate what many Americans saw as a national crisis: an unprecedented number of immigrants flowing into the United States. Experts-women and men trained in the new field of social science-fanned out across the country to collect data on these fresh arrivals. The trove of information they amassed shaped how Americans thought about immigrants, themselves, and the nation's place in the world. Katherine Benton-Cohen argues that the Dillingham Commission's legacy continues to inform the ways that U.S. policy addresses questions raised by immigration, over a century later. Within a decade of its launch, almost all of the commission's recommendations-including a literacy test, a "a system based on national origin, the continuation of Asian exclusion, and greater federal oversight of immigration policy-were implemented into law. Inventing the Immigration Problem describes the labyrinthine bureaucracy, broad administrative authority, and quantitative record-keeping that followed in the wake of these regulations. Their implementation marks a final turn away from an immigration policy motivated by executive-branch concerns over foreign policy and toward one dictated by domestic labor politics. The Dillingham Commission-which remains the largest immigration study ever conducted in the United States-reflects its particular moment in time when mass immigration, the birth of modern social science, and an aggressive foreign policy fostered a newly robust and optimistic notion of federal power. Its quintessentially Progressive formulation of America's immigration problem, and its recommendations, endure today in almost every component of immigration policy, control, and enforcement
Commission · Immigration · Political science · Sociology · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · 1901-1953 · 20th century · Demographic surveys · Demography · emigration and immigration · Government policy · History · Influence · Influence (Literary, artistic, etc.) · Social aspects · united states · United States. Immigration Commission (1907-1910)
“Not All Smugglers are the Same
“Floating Restaurants”
The known and the less known in Israeli international migrations
America First, Immigrants Last
“Their New Jerusalem”
The meaning of welcome. Positive migration discourse
Sons of our race! Help your motherland! Buy Italian! Italian propaganda through food ads among Italian American ethnic communities at the turn of the century
Roundtable on Anti-Semitism in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
Immigrant Declarants and Loyal American Women
Colorado Honor Convicts
Immigration, Plenary Powers, and Sovereignty Talk
Latinx Boys and Juvenile Delinquency
Lifetimes of Instability
What Is a “Moral” Citizen? Learned Hand and the Judicial Role for Defining Immigrant Morality Tests, 1929–61
The Architecture of Immigration Restriction, 1924
Binational Gatekeepers
Déjà Vu and the Gendered Origins of the Practice of Immigration Law
Italianness in the United States between migrants’ informal gardening practices and agricultural diplomacy (1880–1912)
From Mexico to Chicagoland
Hierarchy in the Politics of Migration
Ancestry, Color, or Culture? How Whites Racially Classify Others in the U.S
Nationalism and nation-building in the dietary consumption of Italian migrants in the United States
A Note on the Use of Race and Color in Jewish Social Scientific Research
Blinded by the facts
Horror Vacui
"Introduction to "Reshaping the World
Theorizing with Archives
| Unique citing works | 27 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3.38 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 24 |