The Opinion of Mankind
Sociability and the Theory of the State from Hobbes to Smith
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19933727 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Paul Sagar (0000-0002-8076-7927, Ministry of Economy, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Pages | 280 |
| Publication date | 2018-12-31 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Opinion of Mankind (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Princeton University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1515/9781400889808 |
| OpenAlex | W2789221323 |
| Open Library | OL29367465M |
| ISBN | 9781400889808 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 32 |
How David Hume and Adam Smith forged a new way of thinking about the modern stateWhat is the modern state? Conspicuously undertheorized in recent political theory, this question persistently animated the best minds of the Enlightenment. Recovering David Hume and Adam Smith's long-underappreciated contributions to the history of political thought, The Opinion of Mankind considers how, following Thomas Hobbes's epochal intervention in the mid-seventeenth century, subsequent thinkers grappled with explaining how the state came into being, what it fundamentally might be, and how it could claim rightful authority over those subject to its power. Hobbes has cast a long shadow over Western political thought, particularly regarding the theory of the state. This book shows how Hume and Smith, the two leading lights of the Scottish Enlightenment, forged an alternative way of thinking about the organization of modern politics. They did this in part by going back to the foundations: rejecting Hobbes's vision of human nature and his arguements about our capacity to form stable societies over time. In turn, this was harnessed to a deep reconceptualization of how to think philosophically about politics in a secular world. The result was an emphasis on the "opinion of mankind," the necessary psychological basis of all political organization. Demonstrating how Hume and Smith broke away from Hobbesian state theory, The Opinion of Mankind also suggests ways in which these thinkers might shape how we think about politics today, and in turn how we might construct better political theory
Adam smith · Economics · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Neoclassical economics · Political science · Sociology · State (computer science) · Globalization and Cultural Identity · Mathematics · Philosophy · Political Economy and Marxism · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought · Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life · Whitehead's Philosophy and Applications · 1723-1790 · adam Smith (1723-1790) · david Hume (1711-1776) · Political Science_Philosophy · Smith, Adam · thomas Hobbes (1588-1679)
Recognizing Resentment
A justiça como artifício, campo simbólico e sistema em aberto
Rethinking the “Chicago Smith” Problem
Popular Sovereignty that I Deny”
The model of the legislator
Political realism via pragmatic genealogy or social contracting
Adam Smith's inquiry into the nature and causes of the death of nations
Hobbes, Locke, and the Christian Commonwealth
Transatlantic Anxieties
The King’s three bodies
Material incentives and Kantian optimisation
The History of Political Thought and Parliamentary History in the Eighteenth and Nineteenth Centuries
The Politics of societas and the Early Modern State
Loosening the Need-Concept Tie
A Political and Ameliorative State of Nature
When Genealogy Is Called For
The Benefits of Reverse-Engineering
A Genetic History of Thought
Ideas Worth Having
The Uses of Intrinsic Value
Epigraph
The Normative Significance of Pragmatic Genealogies
Ideas as Remedies to Inconveniences
Why We Came to Think as We Do
Rights, Property, and Politics
Property, Trade and Empire
Early modern parliamentary studies
The Dworkin–Williams debate
Political Theory with an Ethnographic Sensibility
Sociability and education in Kant and Hessen
Adam Smith and the Wealth-Worshipping Spectator
No need for society
| Unique citing works | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,57 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 19 |