Mutual radicalization
How groups and nations drive each other to extremes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19936261 |
|---|---|
| Authors | F M Moghaddam (0000-0002-0462-7973, Georgetown University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Pages | 259 |
| Publication date | 2018-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | Mutual Radicalization (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | American Psychological Association (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1037/0000089-000 |
| OpenAlex | W2808941726 |
| Open Library | OL34570487M |
| ISBN | 9781433829239 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 32 |
"This book is about the powerful dynamic and destructive process termed mutual radicalization, which occurs when two groups take increasingly extreme positions opposing one another. It discusses the psychological processes underlying some key cases of mutual radicalization. The book develops a road map of how mutual radicalization takes place, shaped by underlying psychological processes. Each case study is presented within the same three-stage framework of mutual radicalization: group mobilization, extreme ingroup cohesion, and antagonistic identity transformation. The book is organized in four parts comprising twelve chapters. Part I consists of two case studies involving a nation-state and a nonstate actor, Israel--Palestine; a case involving two nation-states, Iran--United States; and two case studies involving Islamist terrorism and nation-states (the United States and the European Union). Part II describes case studies of nations in transition and in danger of moving further along the path of mutual radicalization. They represent a range of the most important 21st-century conflicts: China--Japan, North Korea--South Korea, and Pakistan--India. Part III presents three case studies of within-state or "domestic" mutual radicalization. The first involves mutual radicalization leading to gridlock in U.S. politics during the last six years of the Obama presidency, the second focuses on mutual radicalization in U.S. politics as represented by the Trump and Sanders presidential election campaigns, and the third explores the relationship between the National Rifle Association and gun-regulation groups in America. Part IV examines solutions to mutual radicalization, with proposals for how to break the cycles of distrust and violence."--Preface. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)
Computer security · Political science · Radicalization · Terrorism · Computer Science · Law · Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence · Political sociology · Psychological aspects · Social conflict
Understanding the motivation to fight
Peace psychology and the deadly competition between democracy and dictatorship
Intergroup conflict and the process of social change
Strongman leadership and mutual radicalization
Mutual radicalization and the coronavirus pandemic
Religiosity and perceived religious discrimination as predictors of support for suicide attacks among Muslim Americans
Defining and Illustrating “Extremism” Using the Largest Investigation into Islam in Prison
Failure Leads Protest Movements to Support More Radical Tactics
Vom Glauben zur Radikalisierung
Die Gefahr der Co-Radikalisierung
Normative and non-normative collective action facing repression in a democratic context
“ Je suis … Charlie, Samuel, Muhammed”
The Psychology of Effective Activism
Muslims and Non‐Muslims
Feelings of anxiety among radical Muslim youths in the Netherlands
Priming Need–Frustrating Memories Sparks Conspiracy Beliefs
Forgiving a Genocide
“We Are Book Eight”
Runaway rights
Revisiting the crowd
Philosophy of education in a new key
Threats to human rights
Messung populistischer und extremistischer Einstellungen“ und „Co-Radikalisierungsprozesse von Islamfeindlichkeit und Islamismus“
How leading climate movement advocates perceive collective gridlock in social change advocacy
Geopolitics in Language
Group Relative Deprivation and Violent Radicalism
Violent political rhetoric on Twitter
People don't change. Are you sure? Deradicalization of opinion among young people
The Volatility of Collective Action
Online Engagement Between Opposing Political Protest Groups via Social Media is Linked to Physical Violence of Offline Encounters
Offline World
Locating the Ideal State
| Unique citing works | 32 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2025 (8) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 25 |