Zohar
Reception and Impact
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 19969736 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Bernard Hu (0000-0002-0244-1630, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, corresponding author), Boaz Huss |
| Year | 2016 |
| Pages | 381 |
| Publication date | 2016-05-12 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | BOOK |
| Venue | The Zohar: reception and impact (SOURCE_BOOK) |
| Publisher | Liverpool University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.3828/liverpool/9781904113966.001.0001 |
| OpenAlex | W3163076011 |
| Open Library | OL26320334M |
| ISBN | 9781904113966 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
From its first appearance, the Zohar has been one of the most sacred, authoritative, and influential books in Jewish culture. Many scholarly works have been dedicated to its mystical content, its literary style, and the question of its authorship. This book focuses on different issues: it examines the various ways in which the Zohar has been received by its readers and the impact it has had on Jewish culture, including the fluctuations in its status and value and the various cultural practices linked to these changes. This dynamic and multi-layered history throws important new light on many aspects of Jewish cultural history over the last seven centuries. The book examines the reception and canonization of the Zohar as well as its criticism and rejection from its inception to the present day. The underlying assumption is that the different values attributed to the Zohar are not inherent qualities of the zoharic texts, but rather represent the way it has been perceived by its readers in different cultural contexts. The book considers not only the attribution of different qualities to the Zohar through time but also the people who were engaged in attributing such qualities and the social and cultural functions associated with their creation, re-creation, and rejection. For each historical period from the beginning of Zohar scholarship to the present, the book considers the social conditions that stimulated the veneration of the Zohar as well as the factors that contributed to its rejection, alongside the cultural functions and consequences of each approach
Aesthetics · Ancient history · Art · Criticism · Jewish culture · Judaism · Literature · Mysticism · Period (music) · Political science · Scholarship · Sociology · Style (visual arts) · Value (mathematics) · Veneration · Archaeology and Historical Studies · Biblical Studies and Interpretation · History · Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies · Law · Cabala · Einfluss · Rezeption · Zohar
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,43 |
| Citation span | 2019 - 2022 (4) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |