Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Protecting Children in the Age of Outrage

A New Perspective on Child Protective Services Reform

Bibliographic Data

ID19972324
AuthorsRam Jagannathan (0000-0001-5614-8176), Radha Jagannathan, Michael J Camasso
Year2013
Pages224
Publication date2013-02-19
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueWhen to Protect? (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195176964.001.0001
OpenAlexW2480014978
Open LibraryOL10133725M
ISBN9780195176964
LanguageEN
Citations received10

This book proposes what, to many professionals in the child welfare field, will appear a radically different explanation for society's decisions to protect children from harm and for the significant drop in substantiated child abuse numbers. At the center of this conceptual and analytic approach is the contention that social outrage emanating from horrific and often sensationalized cases of child maltreatment plays a major role in CPS decision making and in child outcomes. The ebb and flow of outrage invokes three levels of response that are consistent with patterns of the number of child maltreatment reports made to public child welfare agencies, the number of cases screened-in by these CPS agencies, the proportions of alleged cases substantiated as instances of real child abuse or neglect, and the numbers of children placed outside their homes. At the community level, outrage produces amplified surveillance and a posture of “zero-tolerance” while child protection workers, in turn, carry out their duties under a fog of “infinite jeopardy.” With outrage as a driving force, child protective services organizations are forced into changes that are disjointed and highly episodic; changes which follow a course identified in the natural sciences as abrupt equilibrium changes. Through such manifestations as child safety legislation, institutional reform litigation of state child protective services agencies, massive retooling of the CPS workforce, the rise of community surveillance groups and moral entrepreneurs, and the exploitation of fatality statistics by media and politicians evidence is found of outrage at work and its power to change social attitudes, worker decisions and organizational culture

Child abuse · Child protection · Criminology · Environmental health · Harm · Neglect · Outrage · Poison control · Political science · Politics · Psychiatry · Suicide prevention · Welfare · Child Abuse and Trauma · Homicide, Infanticide, and Child Abuse · Law · Medicine · Psychology · Child welfare · Social case work · Social case work with children · Social work with children

  • Measuring the equity of risk assessment instruments used in child protection

    Open Access•Brian Q Jenkins•Children and Youth Services Review•2021

  • Child abuse/neglect risk assessment under field practice conditions

    Open Access•Will Johnson, Thomas Clancy et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2015

  • Conceptualizing and testing the vicious cycle in child protective services

    Open Access•Michael J Camasso, Ram Jagannathan et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2019

  • Social outrage and organizational behavior

    Open Access•Ram Jagannathan, Radha Jagannathan et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2017

  • Nine Key Factors in Extended Litigation-Based Reform of State Child Welfare Agencies

    Open Access•Ariel Alvarez•Children and Youth Services Review•2020

  • Public service integration in hard times

    Open Access•Stephan Köppe, Muiris Maccárthaigh•Administration•2019

  • Counterpoint

    Open Access•Jessica Pryce•Families in Society The Journal…•2025

  • LGBTQ youth in foster care

    Ariel Alvarez•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2019

  • Is Child Welfare Oppressive

    Open Access•Jill D Berrick, Richard P Barth et al.•Journal of Teaching in Social Work•2025

  • Factors associated with the decision to investigate child protective services referrals

    Open Access•Jeri Damman, Michelle Johnson‐Motoyama et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2020

Unique citing works10
Citations per year0,91
Citation span2015 - 2025 (11)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 5

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae