Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is There a Hype Problem in Science? If So, How Is It Addressed

Bibliographic Data

ID19974080
AuthorsP Weingart (0000-0002-8275-525X, corresponding author)
EditorsKathleen Hall Jamieson (0000-0002-4167-3688), Dan M Kahan (0000-0002-2737-2512), Dietram A Scheufele (0000-0002-9914-5407)
Year2017
Publication date2017-06-06
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenueOxford Handbook of the Science of Science Communication (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.12
OpenAlexW2726860239
ISBN9780190497620
LanguageEN
Citations received4

As scientists increasingly communicate with the public, hype (i.e., exaggerating and/or sensationalizing communication with other scientists and with public audiences) has become a matter of concern. There are many sources of hype, some of which reinforce each other—science itself, mass media science reporting, and universities engaging in public relations and self-promotion with varying degrees of legitimacy. Competition for public attention affects science in particular when the resulting hype undermines public perception of science’s commitment to factual evidence, and hype borders on fraud when claims of discoveries prove to be unsubstantiated. Science organizations have reacted by formulating codes of conduct and trying to eliminate both practices that overstate the impact of findings and postpublication activities that distort scholarly conclusions. More research is needed on the effects of hype on public trust in science and the effectiveness of alternative ways to discourage and penalize it

Competition (biology) · Legitimacy · Perception · Political science · Politics · Promotion (chess) · Public opinion · Public relations · Science communication · Science education · Climate Change Communication and Perception · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Rhetoric and Communication Studies

  • Beyond Cheerleading

    Open Access•Scott Frank, Michel Joubert et al.•Journalism Studies•2022

  • Knowledge broker, trust broker, value broker

    Open Access•Irene Broer, Louisa Pröschel•Studies in Communication Sciences•2022

  • Understanding the Problem of “Hype”

    Open Access•Kristen Intemann•Canadian Journal of Philosophy•2022

  • The Efficiency of Hyping

    Open Access•Alice C W Huang•Erkenntnis•2026

Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae