Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Predictive Sentencing

Normative and Empirical Perspectives

Bibliographic Data

ID19987368
EditorsJAN W DE KEIJSER, Julian V Roberts, Jesper Ryberg (0000-0003-2723-1979)
Year2019
Publication date2019-01-01
Open AccessNo
TypeBOOK
VenuePredictive Sentencing (SOURCE_BOOK)
PublisherHart Publishing (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5040/9781509921447
OpenAlexW2950740198
Open LibraryOL34733560M
ISBN9781509921447
LanguageEN
Citations received9

"Predictive Sentencing addresses the role of risk assessment in contemporary sentencing practices. Predictive sentencing has become so deeply ingrained in Western criminal justice decision-making that despite early ethical discussions about selective incapacitation, it currently attracts little critique. Nor has it been subjected to a thorough normative and empirical scrutiny. This is problematic since much current policy and practice concerning risk predictions is inconsistent with mainstream theories of punishment. Moreover, predictive sentencing exacerbates discrimination and disparity in sentencing. Although structured risk assessments may have replaced 'gut feelings', and have now been systematically implemented in Western justice systems, the fundamental issues and questions that surround the use of risk assessment instruments at sentencing remain unresolved. This volume critically evaluates these issues and will be of great interest to scholars of criminal justice and criminology."--Bloomsbury Publishing

Criminal justice · Criminology · Economic Justice · Feeling · Mainstream · Normative · Political science · Punishment (psychology) · Scrutiny · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology · Prison sentences · Sentences (criminal procedure)

  • Understanding racial disparities in pretrial detention recommendations to shape policy reform

    Open Access•Jennifer L Skeem, Lina Montoya et al.•Criminology & Public Policy•2023

  • Thoughts about intersectionality and risk. Interviews with key scholars

    Katarina Giritli Nygren, Anna Olofsson et al.•Journal of Risk Research•2024

  • The Evolution and Implementation of Norway’s Ultimate Penalty

    Open Access•Catherine Appleton, John Todd-Kvam et al.•Law & Social Inquiry•2025

  • The Historical Origins and Evolution of Rehabilitative Punishment

    Michele Pifferi•Crime and Justice•2024

  • Predictions of Dangerousness in Sentencing

    Michael Tonry•Crime and Justice•2019

  • Prediction of violent reoffending in people released from prison in England

    Open Access•Gabrielle Beaudry, Rongqin Yu et al.•Journal of Criminal Justice•2023

  • Revisiting Justice

    Open Access•Netanel Dagan•Revisiting Justice•2025

  • Risk-Based Sentencing and Predictive Accuracy

    Open Access•Jesper Ryberg•Ethical Theory and Moral Practice•2020

  • Valid or voodoo? A qualitative study of attorney perceptions of risk assessment in sentencing and plea bargaining

    Open Access•Anne Metz, Jl Monahan et al.•Journal of Community Psychology•2020

Unique citing works9
Citations per year1,29
Citation span2019 - 2025 (7)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOILibgen
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae